ArticleHuman mutation2019
Predicting pathogenicity of missense variants with weakly supervised regression.
Article in Human mutation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Weakly-Supervised Transfer Learning with Application in Precision Medicine.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2024Article
- CAGI, the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation, establishes progress and prospects for computational genetic variant interpretation methods.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Deep learning and citizen science enable automated plant trait predictions from photographs.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Assessing the performance of in silico methods for predicting the pathogenicity of variants in the gene CHEK2, among Hispanic females with breast cancer.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.Human mutation · 2019Article
- Reports from the fifth edition of CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.Human mutation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quickly growing genetic variation data of unknown clinical significance demand computational methods that can reliably predict clinical phenotypes and deeply unravel molecular mechanisms. On the platform enabled by the Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI), we develop a novel "weakly supervised" regression (WSR) model that not only predicts precise clinical significance (probability of pathogenicity) from inexact training annotations (class of pathogenicity) but also infers underlying molecular mechanisms in a variant-specific manner. Compared to multiclass logistic regression, a representative multiclass classifier, our kernelized WSR improves the performance for the ENIGMA Challenge set from 0.72 to 0.97 in binary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and from 0.64 to 0.80 in ordinal multiclass AUC. WSR model interpretation and protein structural interpretation reach consensus in corroborating the most probable molecular mechanisms by which some pathogenic BRCA1 variants confer clinical significance, namely metal-binding disruption for p.C44F and p.C47Y, protein-binding disruption for p.M18T, and structure destabilization for p.S1715N.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.