Evidence mapPaperPMID 31151439Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2019

Diet quality trends among adults with diabetes by socioeconomic status in the U.S.: 1999-2014.

Colin J Orr, Thomas C Keyserling, Alice S Ammerman, Seth A Berkowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Colin J OrrDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. colin_orr@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-238X
Thomas C KeyserlingDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alice S AmmermanCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Seth A BerkowitzCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · 1999 to 2025
$5.9M
Pilot and Feasibility ProgramP30DK092926 · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · 2025 to 2025
$779k
HRSA HHS T32-14001NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK109200NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK109200NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill U54 RR023499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diet quality of adults living in the United States has improved overtime. We aim to determine whether diet quality among adults with diabetes mellitus has changed over time, and to examine trends in socioeconomic disparities in diet quality.

methodsRepeated cross-sectional analysis of eight National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles (1999-2000 through 2013-2014). We included 5882 adult participants (age 20 or older) with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2) who completed 24-h dietary recalls. Diet quality was measured by the Healthy Eating Index 2010 (HEI) score (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better diet quality). We tested whether there were differences in diet quality across education, income, and food security categories, and whether any differences changed over time, using weighted linear regression models accounting for the complex survey design and adjusted for age, gender, and race/ethnicity.

resultsTwenty nine percent of US adults with diabetes had less than a high school diploma, 17% had income < 100% of federal poverty level, and 15% reported food insecurity. Average adjusted HEI score increased from 49.4 to 52.4 over the study period (p for trend = 0.003). We observed differences in HEI between high and low education (4.1, 95% CI 3.0-5.3), high and low income (3.7, 95%CI 2.4-5.0) and food secure relative to food insecure (2.1, 95% CI 0.8-3.3). These differences did not improve over time for education (p = 0.56), income (p = 0.65) or food security (p = 0.39) categories.

conclusionsDiet quality for adults with diabetes in the U.S. has improved overall; however, substantial disparities exist and have not improved. A concerted effort to improve diet quality in vulnerable groups may be needed.

Indexed as

Social ClassSocioeconomic FactorsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncomeMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPovertyPrognosisDiabetes mellitusDietHealthcare disparitiesNutrition survey

Identifiers

PMID31151439
PMCPMC6544994

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.