Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31164716›Full record

SynthesisCancer gene therapy2020

PROM1 and PROM2 expression differentially modulates clinical prognosis of cancer: a multiomics analysis.

Subbroto Kumar Saha, S M Riazul Islam, Kyung-Sup Kwak, Md Shahedur Rahman, Ssang-Goo Cho

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer gene therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nuclear export of transmembrane protein PROM2 is specially regulated by CRM1 and affects the sensitivity of ferroptosis in gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular and Clinicopathologic Impact of GNAS Variants Across Solid Tumors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Subbroto Kumar Saha *Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea. subbroto@konkuk.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1325-3499
S M Riazul Islam *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Sup KwakSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Inha University, 100, Inha-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon, 22212, Republic of Korea.
Md Shahedur RahmanDepartment of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, 7408, Bangladesh.
Ssang-Goo ChoDepartment of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, 120 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea. ssangoo@konkuk.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0968-7932
Konkuk University · KRInha University · KRSejong University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prominin 1 (PROM1) is considered a biomarker for cancer stem cells, although its biological role is unclear. Prominin 2 (PROM2) has also been associated with certain cancers. However, the prognostic value of PROM1 and PROM2 in cancer is controversial. Here, we performed a systematic data analysis to examine whether prominins can function as prognostic markers in human cancers. The expression of prominins was assessed and their prognostic value in human cancers was determined using univariate and multivariate survival analyses, via various online platforms. We selected a group of prominent functional protein partners of prominins by protein-protein interaction analysis. Subsequently, we investigated the relationship between mutations and copy number alterations in prominin genes and various types of cancers. Furthermore, we identified genes that correlated with PROM1 and PROM2 in certain cancers, based on their levels of expression. Gene ontology and pathway analyses were performed to assess the effect of these correlated genes on various cancers. We observed that PROM1 was frequently overexpressed in esophageal, liver, and ovarian cancers and its expression was negatively associated with prognosis, whereas PROM2 overexpression was associated with poor overall survival in lung and ovarian cancers. Based on the varying characteristics of prominins, we conclude that PROM1 and PROM2 expression differentially modulates the clinical outcomes of cancers.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAC133 AntigenDatasets as TopicDNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMutationNeoplasmsPrognosisProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsSurvival AnalysisAC133 AntigenMembrane GlycoproteinsPROM1 protein, humanPROM2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID31164716
PMCPMC7170805
OpenAlexW2948578084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.