Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31166595›Full record

SynthesisJAMA psychiatry2019

Measuring Disturbance of the Endocannabinoid System in Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Amedeo Minichino, Morwenna Senior, Natascia Brondino, Sam H Zhang, Beata R Godwlewska, Philip W J Burnet, Andrea Cipriani, Belinda R Lennox

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Autism-Psychosis Continuum Conundrum: Exploring the Role of the Endocannabinoid System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Does cannabidiol reduce the adverse effects of cannabis in schizophrenia? A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Research Review: What we have learned about the endocannabinoid system in developmental psychopathology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amedeo MinichinoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Morwenna SeniorDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Natascia BrondinoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Sam H ZhangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Beata R GodwlewskaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Philip W J BurnetDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrea CiprianiDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Belinda R LennoxDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Oxford · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The endocannabinoid system (ECS) is a lipid-based endogenous signaling system. Its relevance to psychosis is through the association between cannabis use and the onset and course of illness and through the antipsychotic properties of cannabidiol, a potential ECS enhancer. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) measures of the ECS in psychotic disorders. Data Sources: Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception through June 13, 2018. The articles identified were reviewed, as were citations to previous publications and the reference lists of retrieved articles. Study Selection: Original articles were included that reported blood or CSF measures of ECS activity in patients with psychotic illnesses and in healthy controls. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA guidelines, independent extraction by multiple observers, and random-effects meta-analysis were used. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 index. Sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinical relevance of ECS modifications in psychotic disorders was investigated by (1) a quantitative synthesis of the differences in blood and CSF markers of the ECS between patients and healthy controls, and (2) a qualitative synthesis of the association of these markers with symptom severity, stage of illness, and response to treatment. Results: A total of 18 studies were included. Three individual meta-analyses were performed to identify the differences in ECS markers between people with schizophrenia and healthy controls. Five studies, including 226 patients and 385 controls, reported significantly higher concentrations of anandamide in the CSF of patients than controls (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.26; P < .001; I2 = 54.8%). In 9 studies, with 344 patients and 411 controls, significantly higher anandamide levels in blood were found in patients, compared with controls (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.05-1.04; P = .03; I2 = 89.6%). In 3 studies, involving 88 patients and 179 controls, a significantly higher expression of type 1 cannabinoid receptors on peripheral immune cells was reported in patients compared with controls (SMD, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P < .001; I2 = 0%). Higher ECS tone was found at an early stage of illness in individuals who were antipsychotic naïve or free, and it had an inverse association with symptom severity and was normalized after successful treatment. Moderate to high level of heterogeneity in methods was found between studies. Conclusions and Relevance: Testing clinically relevant markers of the ECS in the blood and CSF of people with psychotic illness appears possible, and these markers provide useful biomarkers for the psychotic disorder; however, not all studies accounted for important variables, such as cannabis use. Trial Registration: PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018099863.

Indexed as

BiomarkersEndocannabinoidsHumansPsychotic DisordersBiomarkersEndocannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID31166595
PMCPMC6552109
OpenAlexW2948101476

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.