Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31170413›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2019

Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Prevents Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells and Liver Fibrogenesis in Mice.

Jiong Yan, Hung-Chun Tung, Sihan Li, Yongdong Niu, Wojciech G Garbacz, Peipei Lu, Yuhan Bi, Yanping Li, Jinhan He, Meishu Xu and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiong YanCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Hung-Chun TungCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sihan LiCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yongdong NiuCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Wojciech G GarbaczCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Peipei LuCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yuhan BiCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yanping LiDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jinhan HeDepartment of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Meishu XuCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Songrong RenCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Satdarshan P MongaDepartment of Pathology and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Robert F SchwabeDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Da YangCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Wen XieCenter for Pharmacogenetics and Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: wex6@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USSichuan University · CNColumbia University · US

Funding

Role of Wnt/Beta-Catenin Signaling in Liver DevelopmentR01DK062277 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Satdarshan Singh Monga · 2004 to 2026
$9.0M
Xenobiotic Receptors in Mediating the Environmental Effects on Human Disease and MorbidityR35ES030429 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Wen Xie · 2019 to 2026
$6.9M
The AHR-FGF221 Axis in Hepatic Steatosis and Metobolic SyndromeR01DK083952 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI XIE, WEN · 2010 to 2019
$3.0M
A Novel Regulation of the Phase II Enzyme Estrogen SulfotransferaseR01ES023438 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI XIE, WEN · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062277NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK083952NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES023438NIEHS NIH HHS R35 ES030429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe role of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in liver fibrosis is controversial because loss and gain of AhR activity both lead to liver fibrosis. The goal of this study was to investigate how the expression of AhR by different liver cell types, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in particular, affects liver fibrosis in mice.

methodsWe studied the effects of AhR on primary mouse and human HSCs, measuring their activation and stimulation of fibrogenesis using RNA-sequencing analysis. C57BL/6J mice were given the AhR agonists 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) or 2-(1'H-indole-3'-carbonyl)-thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl ester (ITE); were given carbon tetrachloride (CCl

resultsAhR was expressed at high levels in quiescent HSCs, but the expression decreased with HSC activation. Activation of HSCs from AhR-knockout mice was accelerated compared with HSCs from wild-type mice. In contrast, TCDD or ITE inhibited spontaneous and transforming growth factor β-induced activation of HSCs. Mice with disruption of Ahr in HSCs, but not hepatocytes or Kupffer cells, developed more severe fibrosis after administration of CCl

conclusionsIn studies of human and mouse HSCs, we found that AhR prevents HSC activation and expression of genes required for liver fibrogenesis. Development of nontoxic AhR agonists or strategies to activate AhR signaling in HSCs might be developed to prevent or treat liver fibrosis.

Indexed as

Cellular SenescenceAnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteinsbeta CateninCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryGene Expression RegulationHepatic Stellate CellsIndolesLiverLiver Cirrhosis, ExperimentalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutPhenotype2-(1'H-indole-3'-carbonyl)thiazole-4-carboxylic acid methyl esterAHR protein, humanAhr protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteinsbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, mouseIndolesReceptors, Aryl HydrocarbonSmad3 ProteinSmad3 protein, mouseThiazolesCell Type-Specific EffectGene RegulationSignal TransductionXenobiotic Receptor

Identifiers

PMID31170413
PMCPMC6707837
OpenAlexW2948955892

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.