ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2019
Is it possible to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy with dexpanthenol?
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protective effect of dexpanthenol in tacrolimus-induced nephrotoxicity in rats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeContrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is one of the side effects of diagnostic procedures. Oxidative stress plays an important role in CIN's pathophysiology. Dexpanthenol (Dexp) is a substance with antioxidant efficacy. We investigated the likely protective effects of dexpanthenol for CIN.
methodsTwenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into four groups of 6 rats; control (group 1), Dexp (group 2), CIN (group 3) and Dexp + CIN (group 4). All rats were restricted of water moderately to facilitate of nephrotoxicity. Dexp was administered into the intraperitoneally at a dose of 500 mg/kg for 5 days in groups 2 and 4. The same amount of saline was applied via intraperitoneally to group 1 and 3. In CIN and Dexp + CIN groups, L-NAME (10 mg/kg), tenoxicam (0.5 mg/kg) and sodium amidotrizoate (10 ml/kg) were administered on the 4th day via the tail vein for CIN. All rats were euthanized on the 6th day and samples for biochemical and pathological evaluations were collected.
resultsWhen the Dexp + CIN group and the CIN group were compared, it was found to be provide a significant decline at the level of acute tubular injury and necrosis in kidney biopsies by dexp. Furthermore Dexp significantly reduced the serum cystatin C (Cys-C) levels, not serum creatinine. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in total oxidant and antioxidant levels.
conclusionsDexpanthenol did not have significant effect on oxidative stress of acute kidney injury on this rat model. However, it has ameliorated serum Cys-C levels and histopathological findings of CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.