Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31209681›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2020

Blood pressure phenotype reproducibility in CKD outpatients: a clinical practice report.

Adamasco Cupisti, R M Bruno, A Puntoni, E Varricchio, E Giglio, O Meniconi, C Zullo, M Barsotti, M F Egidi, L Ghiadoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blood pressure phenotype: an evolving picture.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adamasco CupistiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy. adamasco.cupisti@med.unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-936X
R M BrunoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
A PuntoniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
E VarricchioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
E GiglioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
O MeniconiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
C ZulloDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
M BarsottiNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unity, Pisa University Hospital, via Paradisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
M F EgidiNephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unity, Pisa University Hospital, via Paradisa, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
L GhiadoniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is encouraged by recent hypertension guidelines for assessing BP phenotypes. These showed acceptable reproducibility in the short term, but few data exist about long-term reproducibility, particularly for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We evaluated changes of the BP phenotypes at 6 and 12 months in 280 consecutive non-dialysis CKD outpatients (186 males, age 71 ± 12 years, eGFR 38 ± 13 ml/min/1.73), without any change in drug therapy. Elevated BP is defined as office BP > 140/90 and home BP > 135/85 mmHg for defining the following BP phenotypes: sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH); white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH); masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH); and controlled hypertension (CH). At baseline, the prevalence of the phenotypes was SUCH 36.6%, CH 30.1%, WUCH 25.4% and MUCH 7.9%, and it was similar at 6 months and 12 months. On the other hand, individual phenotype reproducibility at 12 months was poor both overall (38.0%) and across the different phenotypes (SUCH 53.9%, WUCH 32.4% and CH 32.1%, MUCH 9.1%). Patients who were not maintaining the same phenotype (non-concordant) were not distinguished by age, sex, BMI, eGFR, presence of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, or pharmacological therapy. When reproducibility of BP phenotypes both at 6 months and at 12 months was assessed, it was very low (19.6%), particularly for MUCH (0%), CH (14%) and WUCH (15.5%), while it was 31% for SUCH. In a CKD cohort, the overall prevalence of the different BP phenotypes defined by office and home BP remains constant over time. However, only 38% of patients maintained the same phenotype at 12 months, suggesting a poor reproducibility over time for the BP phenotypes.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Care FacilitiesBlood PressureFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk FactorsStatistics, NonparametricWhite Coat HypertensionBlood pressureCKDHypertensionPhenotypesReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID31209681
OpenAlexW2949445068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.