ArticleRoyal Society open science2019
Original plant traceability of
Article in Royal Society open science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivar to chemotype: characterizing complex botanicals with mass spectrometry metabolomics.Natural product reports · 2026Review
- Geographical Origin Identification ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent trends of machine learning applied to multi-source data of medicinal plants.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Chemometric-Guided Approaches for Profiling and Authenticating Botanical Materials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Review
- Rapid Quality Identification of Decoction Pieces of Crude and ProcessedJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2021Article
- An integrated spectroscopic strategy to trace the geographical origins of emblic medicines: Application for the quality assessment of natural medicines.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2020Article
- Discrimination ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.