Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31221101›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2019

Frequentist p-values for large-scale-single step genome-wide association, with an application to birth weight in American Angus cattle.

Ignacio Aguilar, Andres Legarra, Fernando Cardoso, Yutaka Masuda, Daniela Lourenco, Ignacy Misztal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Paraphyletic Origins of Genetic Resistance to Cabbage Stem Flea Beetle inPlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome-wide association study of mature cow size traits in American Angus cattle.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ignacio AguilarInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), 90200, Canelones, Uruguay.
Andres LegarraUMR GenPhySE, INRA Toulouse, BP52626, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France. andres.legarra@inra.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-7620
Fernando CardosoDepartment of Animal Science, Federal University of Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Yutaka MasudaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Ignacy MisztalDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2015-67015-22936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (SSGBLUP) is a comprehensive method for genomic prediction. Point estimates of marker effects from SSGBLUP are often used for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) without a formal framework of hypothesis testing. Our objective was to implement p-values for single-marker GWAS studies within the single-step GWAS (SSGWAS) framework by deriving computational algorithms and procedures, and by applying these to a large beef cattle population.

methodsP-values were obtained based on the prediction error (co)variances for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which were obtained from the prediction error (co)variances of genomic predictions based on the inverse of the coefficient matrix and formulas to estimate SNP effects.

resultsComputation of p-values took a negligible time for a dataset with almost 2 million animals in the pedigree and 1424 genotyped sires, and no inflation of statistics was observed. The SNPs that passed the Bonferroni threshold of 10

conclusionsThe use of a p-value for SSGWAS is a very general and efficient strategy to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL). It can be used for complex datasets such as those used in animal breeding, where only a proportion of the pedigreed animals are genotyped.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersAlgorithmsAnimalsBirth WeightCattleDatasets as TopicFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31221101
PMCPMC6584984

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.