Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31225632›Full record

GuidelineCardiology journal2019

Consensus document for invasive coronary physiologic assessment in Asia-Pacific countries.

Hak Seung Lee, Joo Myung Lee, Chang-Wook Nam, Eun-Seok Shin, Joon-Hyung Doh, Neng Dai, Martin K C Ng, Andy S C Yong, Damras Tresukosol, Ajit S Mullasari and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus StatementPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Cardiology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical Impact of Concordant and Discordant Physiology Parameters Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the EASY-PREDICT Study.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Diagnostic performance of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2024
    Article
  7. Comparison of 2D-QCA, 3D-QCA and coronary angiography derived FFR in predicting myocardial ischemia assessed by CZT-SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Planning percutaneous interventions with optical flow ratio: "niu" odds in favour of imaging in the year of the Ox.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The legacy of ISCHEMIA.Cardiology journal · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 17 institutions in 8 countries.

Hak Seung LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joo Myung LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Wook NamDepartment of Medicine, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Seok ShinDepartment of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.
Joon-Hyung DohDepartment of Medicine, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Neng DaiDepartment of Cardiology, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Martin K C NgDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
Andy S C YongDepartment of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Damras TresukosolDivision of Cardiology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ajit S MullasariInstitute of Cardiovascular Diseases, The Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India.
Rony MathewLisie Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Praveen ChandraMedanta, Gurgaon, India.
Kuang-Te WangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taitung Branch, Taiwan.
Yundai ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiyan ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Kai-Hang YiuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Nils P JohnsonMcGovern Medical School at UTHealth and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States.
Bon-Kwon KooDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. bkkoo@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRChinese PLA General Hospital · CNConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUGuangdong General Hospital · CNInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRKeimyung University Dongsan Medical Center · KRLourdes Hospital · INMackay Memorial Hospital · TWMadras Medical Mission · INMedanta The Medicity · INMemorial Hermann · USRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUSiriraj Hospital · THSungkyunkwan University · KRSun Yat-sen University · CNUlsan University Hospital · KRUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, invasive physiologic assessment such as fractional flow reserve is widely used worldwide with different adoption rates around the globe. Patient characteristics and physician preferences often differ in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with respect to treatment strategy, techniques, lesion complexity, access to coronary physiology and imaging devices, as well as patient management. Thus, there is a need to construct a consensus document on recommendations for use of physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in APAC populations. This document serves as an overview of recommendations describing the best practices for APAC populations to achieve more consistent and optimal clinical outcomes. METHODS AND

resultsA comprehensive multiple-choice questionnaire was provided to 20 interven- tional cardiologists from 10 countries in the APAC region. Clinical evidence, tips and techniques, and clinical situations for the use of physiology-guided PCI in APAC were reviewed and used to propose key recommendations. There are suggestions to continue to develop evidence for lesion and patient types that will benefit from physiology, develop directions for future research in health economics and local data, develop appropriate use criteria in different countries, and emphasize the importance of education of all stakeholders. A consensus recommendation to enhance the penetration of invasive physiology-based therapy was to adopt the 5E approach: Evidence, Education, Expand hardware, Economics and Expert consensus.

conclusionsThis consensus document and recommendations support interventional fellows and cardiologists, hospital administrators, patients, and medical device companies to build confidence and encourage wider implementation of invasive coronary physiology-guided therapy in the APAC region.

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialAsiaAustraliaCardiologyConsensusCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultscoronary physiologyinvasive physiologic assessmentquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31225632
PMCPMC8086662
OpenAlexW2950945382

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.