Evidence mapPaperPMID 31230593Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019

Impact of caffeine on myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by semiquantitative adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Andreas Seitz, Philipp Kaesemann, Maria Chatzitofi, Stephanie Löbig, Gloria Tauscher, Raffi Bekeredjian, Udo Sechtem, Heiko Mahrholdt, Simon Greulich

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. 2020 - State of our JCMR.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SeitzDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Philipp KaesemannDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Maria ChatzitofiDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stephanie LöbigDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Gloria TauscherDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Raffi BekeredjianDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Udo SechtemDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany.
Heiko MahrholdtDepartment of Cardiology, Robert Bosch Medical Center, Auerbachstraße 110, 70376, Stuttgart, Germany. Heiko.mahrholdt@rbk.de.
Simon GreulichDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Robert Bosch Hospital · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenosine is used in stress perfusion cardiac imaging to reveal myocardial ischemia by its vasodilator effects. Caffeine is a competitive antagonist of adenosine. However, previous studies reported inconsistent results about the influence of caffeine on adenosine's vasodilator effect. This study assessed the impact of caffeine on the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) using adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Moreover, we sought to evaluate if the splenic switch-off sign might be indicative of prior caffeine consumption.

methodsSemiquantitative perfusion analysis was performed in 25 patients who underwent: 1) caffeine-naïve adenosine stress CMR demonstrating myocardial ischemia and, 2) repeat adenosine stress CMR after intake of caffeine. MPRI (global; remote and ischemic segments), and splenic perfusion ratio (SPR) were assessed and compared between both exams.

resultsGlobal MPRI after caffeine was lower vs. caffeine-naïve conditions (1.09 ± 0.19 vs. 1.24 ± 0.19; p <  0.01). MPRI in remote myocardium decreased by caffeine (1.24 ± 0.19 vs. 1.49 ± 0.19; p <  0.001) whereas MPRI in ischemic segments (0.89 ± 0.18 vs. 0.95 ± 0.23; p = 0.23) was similar, resulting in a lower MPRI ratio (=remote/ischemic segments) after caffeine consumption vs. caffeine-naïve conditions (1.41 ± 0.19 vs. 1.64 ± 0.35, p = 0.01). The SPR was unaffected by caffeine (SPR 0.38 ± 0.19 vs. 0.38 ± 0.18; p = 0.92).

conclusionCaffeine consumption prior to adenosine stress CMR results in a lower global MPRI, which is driven by the decreased MPRI in remote myocardium and underlines the need of abstinence from caffeine. The splenic switch-off sign is not affected by prior caffeine intake.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineAdenosineAgedCaffeineCoronary CirculationFemaleHumansHyperemiaMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesPurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsReproducibility of ResultsAdenosineCaffeinePurinergic P1 Receptor AntagonistsVasodilator AgentsAdenosine stress CMRCaffeineIschemiaMPRIMyocardial perfusion reserveSplenic switch-off

Identifiers

PMID31230593
PMCPMC6589875
OpenAlexW2953066937

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.