Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31238531›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Applications of Ultrasound to Stimulate Therapeutic Revascularization.

Catherine M Gorick, John C Chappell, Richard J Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Osteonecrosis of the Jaws: An Update and Review of Literature.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MethodsX · 2022
    Article
  8. From Increased Fluid Shear Stress to Natural Bypass Growth.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Catherine M GorickDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. cmg6ae@virginia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0139-3438
John C ChappellFralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA. jchappell@vtc.vt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0427-5170
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. rprice@virginia.edu.

Funding

MRI-Guided miRNA Nanoparticle Delivery to Glioblastoma With Focused UltrasoundR01EB020147 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
Endothelial DNA Methylation, Arteriogenic Capacity, and Shear Stress "Set-Point."R21EB024323 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2017 to 2018
$442k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020147NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024323NIH HHS R01EB020147 and R21EB024323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many pathological conditions are characterized or caused by the presence of an insufficient or aberrant local vasculature. Thus, therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating the caliber and/or density of the vasculature by controlling angiogenesis and arteriogenesis have been under development for many years. As our understanding of the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms of these vascular growth processes continues to grow, so too do the available targets for therapeutic intervention. Nonetheless, the tools needed to implement such therapies have often had inherent weaknesses (i.e., invasiveness, expense, poor targeting, and control) that preclude successful outcomes. Approximately 20 years ago, the potential for using ultrasound as a new tool for therapeutically manipulating angiogenesis and arteriogenesis began to emerge. Indeed, the ability of ultrasound, especially when used in combination with contrast agent microbubbles, to mechanically manipulate the microvasculature has opened several doors for exploration. In turn, multiple studies on the influence of ultrasound-mediated bioeffects on vascular growth and the use of ultrasound for the targeted stimulation of blood vessel growth via drug and gene delivery have been performed and published over the years. In this review article, we first discuss the basic principles of therapeutic ultrasound for stimulating angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. We then follow this with a comprehensive cataloging of studies that have used ultrasound for stimulating revascularization to date. Finally, we offer a brief perspective on the future of such approaches, in the context of both further research development and possible clinical translation.

Indexed as

Ultrasonic WavesAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersContrast MediaDrug Delivery SystemsGene Transfer TechniquesHumansMicrobubblesNeovascularization, PathologicNeovascularization, PhysiologicUltrasonic TherapyVascular RemodelingAngiogenesis Inducing AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersContrast Mediaarteriogenesisbiomaterialsdrug and gene deliverymicrobubblestherapeutic revascularizationultrasound

Identifiers

PMID31238531
PMCPMC6627741

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.