Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31240404›Full record

SynthesisCurrent hypertension reports2019

Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review of Evidence on Clinical Utility.

George Stergiou, Emelina Stambolliu, Ioanna Bountzona, Angeliki Ntineri, Anastasios Kollias, Andriani Vazeou, Alexandra Soldatou

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypertension in children and adolescents: perspectives in Japan.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

George StergiouHypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece. stergiougs@gmail.com.
Emelina StambolliuHypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Ioanna BountzonaHypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Angeliki NtineriHypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Anastasios KolliasHypertension Center STRIDE-7, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Andriani VazeouFirst Department of Pediatrics, P&A Kyriakou Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Alexandra SoldatouSecond Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, P&A Kyriakou Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSotiria General Hospital · GRPanagiotis & Aglaia Kyriakou Children's Hospital · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFor the accurate diagnosis and management of hypertension, out-of-office blood pressure evaluation using ambulatory (ABPM) or home monitoring (HBPM) is currently recommended. In children, there is considerable evidence on the clinical utility of ABPM, whereas the evidence on HBPM is limited. This systematic review presents (i) the benefits of HBPM in children; (ii) the evidence on normal range, diagnostic accuracy, and relationship with preclinical organ damage; and (iii) guidance for devices, monitoring schedule, and interpretation. RECENT

findingsHBPM is a useful adjunct to the conventional office measurements for the evaluation of children with suspected or treated hypertension. HBPM is feasible in children and has good reproducibility, diagnostic accuracy and acceptability by users, and relatively low cost. Thus, it has greater potential for widespread and long-term use than ABPM, which is more expensive and often not available or not tolerated. Automated monitors that have been clinically validated specifically in children should be used with appropriate cuff size. HBPM for 7 days (minimum 3) with duplicate morning and evening measurements (minimum 12 readings) should be performed in children with suspected or treated hypertension before each office visit. Until more data become available, in case of diagnostic disagreement between office blood pressure and HBPM, treatment decisions should be based on ABPM. HBPM is clinically useful in children with hypertension. More research is needed on its clinical application, and more automated devices need to be clinically validated in this population.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAdolescentBlood PressureChildHumansReproducibility of ResultsAmbulatory blood pressure monitoringDiagnosisMasked hypertensionOut of officeSelf-measurementWhite coat hypertension

Identifiers

PMID31240404
OpenAlexW2955084668

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.