ReviewDrugs2019
Designing Poly-agonists for Treatment of Metabolic Diseases: Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Polymorphic amyloid nanostructures of hormone peptides involved in glucose homeostasis display reversible amyloid formation.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Novel Long-Acting Oxytocin Analog with Increased Efficacy in Reducing Food Intake and Body Weight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Discovery of Cobimetinib as a novel A-FABP inhibitor using machine learning and molecular docking-based virtual screening.RSC advances · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and the numerous associated metabolic co-morbidities are growing global threats to public health. Despite recent progress in pharmacotherapies for metabolic diseases, the current treatment options have limited efficacy and provide mostly symptomatic relief with little or no impact on disease reversal. Thus, improved therapies are urgently needed. As a result, the scientific community has increasingly invested in leveraging new pathophysiological insights into more efficacious pharmacotherapies for metabolic complications. A heightened understanding of the large, interindividual variation in responsiveness to certain metabolic medicines combined with advances in engineering multi-agonist candidates are important steps towards this goal. Additionally, the emerging pharmacological concept of peptide-mediated targeting of small molecules for tissue-specific delivery holds promise for more powerful treatment solutions in the future. In this review, we summarize recent advances in medicinal chemistry and molecular pharmacology that have enabled the engineering of several, novel, poly-agonist drug candidates for treatment of metabolic diseases, and we discuss the recent results from clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1/glucagon and GLP-1/GIP co-agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.