Evidence mapPaperPMID 31243985Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2019

Industrial, Biocide, and Cosmetic Chemical Inducers of Cholestasis.

Vânia Vilas-Boas, Eva Gijbels, Axelle Cooreman, Raf Van Campenhout, Emma Gustafson, Kaat Leroy, Mathieu Vinken

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hematological indices as indicators of inflammation induced by exposure to pesticides.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  4. COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance: A cross-study.The Science of the total environment · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In Vitro Liver Toxicity Testing of Chemicals: A Pragmatic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Rodent models of cholestatic liver disease: A practical guide for translational research.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vânia Vilas-BoasDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Eva GijbelsDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Axelle CooremanDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Raf Van CampenhoutDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Emma GustafsonDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Kaat LeroyDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.
Mathieu VinkenDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology , Vrije Universiteit Brussel , Brussels , Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5115-8893
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

European Research Council 335476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A frequent side effect of many drugs includes the occurrence of cholestatic liver toxicity. Over the past couple of decades, drug-induced cholestasis has gained considerable attention, resulting in a plethora of data regarding its prevalence and mechanistic basis. Likewise, several food additives and dietary supplements have been reported to cause cholestatic liver insults in the past few years. The induction of cholestatic hepatotoxicity by other types of chemicals, in particular synthetic compounds, such as industrial chemicals, biocides, and cosmetic ingredients, has been much less documented. Such information can be found in occasional clinical case reports of accidental intake or suicide attempts as well as in basic and translational study reports on mechanisms or testing of new therapeutics in cholestatic animal models. This paper focuses on such nonpharmaceutical and nondietary synthetic chemical inducers of cholestatic liver injury, in particular alpha-naphthylisocyanate, 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine, methylenedianiline, paraquat, tartrazine, triclosan, 2-octynoic acid, and 2-nonynoic acid. Most of these cholestatic compounds act by similar mechanisms. This could open perspectives for the prediction of cholestatic potential of chemicals.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryAnimalsCholestasisCosmeticsDisinfectantsHumansIndicators and ReagentsLiverMiceOrganic ChemicalsRatsCosmeticsDisinfectantsIndicators and ReagentsOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID31243985
PMCPMC7176485
OpenAlexW2948661252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.