Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31250385›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m

Chetan D Parmar, Catherine Bryant, Enrique Luque-de-Leon, Cesare Peraglie, Arun Prasad, Karl Rheinwalt, Mario Musella

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Patients With a BMI ≥50 kg/mJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery · 2025
    Review
  13. One-anastomosis gastric bypassWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chetan D ParmarWhittington Hospital, London, N19 5NF, UK. cparmar@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-6524
Catherine BryantWhittington Hospital, London, N19 5NF, UK.
Enrique Luque-de-LeonMexican Institute of Social Security, Mexico City, Mexico.
Cesare PeraglieHeart of Florida Regional Medical Center, Davenport, FL, 33837, USA.
Arun PrasadManipal Hospitals, Delhi, India.
Karl RheinwaltSt. Franziskus-Hospital, Cologne, Germany.
Mario MusellaNaples "Federico II" University, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the role of one anastomosis (Mini) gastric bypass (OAGB) for the super-obese patients.

methodLiterature review was performed in March 2019 as per PRISMA guidelines.

resultsA total of 318 patients were identified. Mean age was 31.8 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 57.4 kg/m

conclusionsOAGB is a safe and effective option for management of super and super-super obese patients with tailoring of the BPL. Larger comparison, follow-up and randomised trials are necessary to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAnastomosis, SurgicalGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansLength of StayMorbidityObesity, MorbidOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsStomachTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryBMI > 50 kg/m2Gastric bypassMini gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypassSuper obese

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.