ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Reduced miR-202 levels enhanced oral cancer development via targeting Sp1.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The microRNA-202 as a Diagnostic Biomarker and a Potential Tumor Suppressor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Reduced serum miR-202 may promote the progression of Alzheimer's disease patients via targeting amyloid precursor protein.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- MicroRNA‑202 inhibits endometrial stromal cell migration and invasion by suppressing the K‑Ras/Raf1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway.International journal of molecular medicine · 2020Article
- Human Papillomavirus Infection in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Transcriptional Triggers and Changed Disease Patterns.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-04-15Concerns/Issues about Data · Euphemisms for Plagiarism · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Plagiarism of Data · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/F040D433E1AE003FCCD54EC73CE91A
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study aimed to evaluate the possible role of microRNA (miR)-202 in the development of oral cancer. First, miR-202 levels were found to be decreased in the serum and tissues of oral cancer patients compared with healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was carried out to explore the diagnostic value of serum miR-202 for oral cancer. Overexpression of miR-202 significantly decreased the migratory capacity of SCC-9 cells, while inhibition of miR-202 markedly increased the migratory capacity of SCC-9 cells. Moreover, the invasive capacity was decreased in SCC-9 cells transfected with an miR-202 mimic. In addition, the invasive capacity was enhanced in SCC-9 cells transfected with an miR-202 inhibitor. A dual luciferase reporter assay showed that overexpression of miR-202 markedly suppressed the relative luciferase activity of the pmirGLO-SP1-3'untranslated region. Overexpression of miR-202 suppressed the protein level of Sp1, but inhibition of miR-202 markedly enhanced the protein expression of Sp1. Inhibition of miR-202 enhanced the phosphorylation of protein kinase B. Additionally, the correlations between the expression levels of Sp1 and miR-202 and the clinicopathological factors of oral cancer were analyzed. The results showed that patients with high expression of Sp1 and miR-202 progressed to earlier clinical stages, had deeper infiltration depths and were more prone to lymph node metastasis compared with the healthy controls. In conclusion, the current study presented novel data indicating that decreased miR-202 enhanced the progression of oral cancer via Sp1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.