Evidence mapPaperPMID 31258905Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2019

SMART goals setting and biometric changes in obese adults with multimorbidity: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Paul Y Takahashi, Stephanie M Quigg, Ivana T Croghan, Darrell R Schroeder, Jon O Ebbert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul Y TakahashiDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-309X
Stephanie M QuiggDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ivana T CroghanDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Darrell R SchroederDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon O EbbertDivision of Primary Care Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesClinicians recommend diet and exercise for overweight/obese patients. We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating goal setting and pedometer use versus usual care on weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure of patients with multiple chronic conditions.

methodsIn this trial, we recruited and randomized patients over 18 years with multiple chronic conditions. There were two groups with an immediate intervention group who received behavioral coaching and a pedometer versus a delayed control who received the intervention after 2 months. We evaluated body weight, waist circumference, and blood pressure as outcomes. We used analysis of covariance to evaluate differences between the intervention and the control groups.

resultsOf 130 patients, mean age was 63.4 years (SD, 17.3). At 2 months, intervention participants lost 0.2 kg versus a 0.1-kg gain in the control participants ( DISCUSSION: We observed no difference in weight or blood pressure between the groups with obesity and multiple chronic conditions.

Indexed as

Blood pressuredietgoal settingmultimorbidityobesitypedometer

Identifiers

PMID31258905
PMCPMC6591663
OpenAlexW2954209465

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.