Evidence mapPaperPMID 31271793Full record

ReviewPharmacology & therapeutics2019

The endothelial mineralocorticoid receptor: Contributions to sex differences in cardiovascular disease.

M Elizabeth Moss, Brigett Carvajal, Iris Z Jaffe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: A Dangerous Liaison.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Elizabeth MossMolecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America; Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Brigett CarvajalMolecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America; Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Iris Z JaffeMolecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America; Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America. Electronic address: ijaffe@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Tufts University · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

Tufts Post-Baccalaureate Research Education ProgramR25GM066567 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI Maribel Rios · 2002 to 2024
$2.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS F30 HL137255NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095590NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM066567
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death for both men and women. The observation that premenopausal women are protected from cardiovascular disease relative to age-matched men, and that this protection is lost with menopause, has led to extensive study of the role of sex steroid hormones in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. However, the molecular basis for sex differences in cardiovascular disease is still not fully understood, limiting the ability to tailor therapies to male and female patients. Therefore, there is a growing need to investigate molecular pathways outside of traditional sex hormone signaling to fully understand sex differences in cardiovascular disease. Emerging evidence points to the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a steroid hormone receptor activated by the adrenal hormone aldosterone, as one such mediator of cardiovascular disease risk, potentially serving as a sex-dependent link between cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Enhanced activation of the MR by aldosterone is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Emerging evidence implicates the MR specifically within the endothelial cells lining the blood vessels in mediating some of the sex differences observed in cardiovascular pathology. This review summarizes the available clinical and preclinical literature concerning the role of the MR in the pathophysiology of endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and heart failure, with a special emphasis on sex differences in the role of endothelial-specific MR in these pathologies. The available data regarding the molecular mechanisms by which endothelial-specific MR may contribute to sex differences in cardiovascular disease is also summarized. A paradigm emerges from synthesis of the literature in which endothelial-specific MR regulates vascular function in a sex-dependent manner in response to cardiovascular risk factors to contribute to disease. Limitations in this field include the relative paucity of women in clinical trials and, until recently, the nearly exclusive use of male animals in preclinical investigations. Enhanced understanding of the sex-specific roles of endothelial MR could lead to novel mechanistic insights underlying sex differences in cardiovascular disease incidence and outcomes and could identify additional therapeutic targets to effectively treat cardiovascular disease in men and women.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesEndothelium, VascularHumansReceptors, MineralocorticoidReceptors, MineralocorticoidAldosteroneCardiovascular diseaseEndothelial cellEstrogenMineralocorticoid receptorSex differences

Identifiers

PMID31271793
PMCPMC6848769
OpenAlexW2954205159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.