ArticleScientific reports2019
Morphological Brain Age Prediction using Multi-View Brain Networks Derived from Cortical Morphology in Healthy and Disordered Participants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the predictive value of structural covariance networks for the diagnosis of schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- In patients with mild disability NMOSD: is the alteration in the cortical morphological or functional network topological properties more significant.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Predicting 'Brainage' in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Discovery of novel JAK1 inhibitors through combining machine learning, structure-based pharmacophore modeling and bio-evaluation.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Predicting 'Brainage' in the Developmental Period using Structural MRI, Morphometric Similarity, and Machine Learning.Research square · 2023Article
- Cognitive impairment in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: Pre-treatment findings of a longitudinal study.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Multiple sclerosis clinical forms classification with graph convolutional networks based on brain morphological connectivity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brain Age Prediction: A Comparison between Machine Learning Models Using Brain Morphometric Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Brain-age estimation accuracy is significantly increased using multishell free-water reconstruction.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Individual-specific networks for prediction modelling - A scoping review of methods.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Explainable Deep Learning for Personalized Age Prediction With Brain Morphology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Disentangled-Multimodal Adversarial Autoencoder: Application to Infant Age Prediction With Incomplete Multimodal Neuroimages.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- An automated machine learning approach to predict brain age from cortical anatomical measures.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Extensive Evaluation of Morphological Statistical Harmonization for Brain Age Prediction.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Improved prediction of brain age using multimodal neuroimaging data.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Brain Age Prediction With Morphological Features Using Deep Neural Networks: Results From Predictive Analytic Competition 2019.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain development and aging are dynamic processes that unfold over years on multiple levels in both healthy and disordered individuals. Recent studies have revealed a disparity between the chronological brain age and the 'data-driven' brain age using functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI). Particularly, predicting the 'brain age' from connectomic data might help identify relevant connectional biomarkers of neurological disorders that emerge early or late in the lifespan. While prior brain-age prediction studies have relied exclusively on either structural or functional connectomic data, here we unprecedentedly propose to predict the morphological age of the brain by solely using morphological brain networks (derived from T1-weighted images) in both healthy and disordered populations. Besides, although T1-weighted MRI was widely used for brain age prediction, it was leveraged from an image-based analysis perspective not from a connectomic perspective. Our method includes the following steps: (i) building multi-view morphological brain networks (M-MBN), (ii) feature extraction and selection, (iii) training a machine-learning regression model to predict age from M-MBN data, and (iv) utilizing our model to identify connectional brain features related to age in both autistic and healthy populations. We demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches and discovered brain connectional morphological features that fingerprint the age of brain cortical morphology in both autistic and healthy individuals. In particular, we discovered that the connectional cortical thickness best predicts the morphological age of the autistic brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.