ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2019
[Teleradiology in the TraumaNetwork DGU®].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Health Care, Telemedicine, and Medicolegal Issues in Orthopedics: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- [Possibilities of the utilization of trauma networks of the German Society for Trauma Surgery using digital solutions].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- [Orthopedics and trauma surgery in the digital age].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Medical Legal Aspects of Telemedicine in Italy: Application Fields, Professional Liability and Focus on Care Services During the COVID-19 Health Emergency.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital exchange of images and diagnostic findings has become more and more popular in German hospitals in recent years. Solutions such as the TKmed telecooperation platform, which was developed on behalf of the German Trauma Society (DGU), have meanwhile also become established in the clinical routine of trauma surgery and can be very useful in cases of emergency relocation, for requesting second opinions, in questions with respect to the severely injured type procedure (SAV) and other applications. A fast, secure and privacy-conform exchange of treatment and imaging data can be beneficial, particularly in the care of severely injured patients. This article provides an overview of the development and use of teleradiology tools in trauma networks across Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31273404What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.