Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31295650›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2019

Switching states: dynamic remodelling of polarity complexes as a toolkit for cell polarization.

Florent Peglion, Nathan W Goehring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. PLK-1 regulates MEX-1 polarization in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Going with the flow: insights fromPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Adherens Junctions: Guardians of Cortical Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florent PeglionCell Polarity, Migration and Cancer Unit, Institut Pasteur, UMR3691 CNRS, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, F-75015, Paris, France.
Nathan W GoehringThe Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, UCL, London, UK. Electronic address: nate.goehring@crick.ac.uk.
Institut Pasteur · FRThe Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16797Cancer Research UK FC001086Medical Research Council FC001086Wellcome Trust FC001086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polarity is defined by the segregation of cellular components along a defined axis. To polarize robustly, cells must be able to break symmetry and subsequently amplify these nascent asymmetries. Finally, asymmetric localization of signaling molecules must be translated into functional regulation of downstream effector pathways. Central to these behaviors are a diverse set of cell polarity networks. Within these networks, molecules exhibit varied behaviors, dynamically switching among different complexes and states, active versus inactive, bound versus unbound, immobile versus diffusive. This ability to switch dynamically between states is intimately connected to the ability of molecules to generate asymmetric patterns within cells. Focusing primarily on polarity pathways governed by the conserved PAR proteins, we discuss strategies enabled by these dynamic behaviors that are used by cells to polarize. We highlight not only how switching between states is linked to the ability of polarity proteins to localize asymmetrically, but also how cells take advantage of 'state switching' to regulate polarity in time and space.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityAnimalsCell CycleModels, BiologicalOrganogenesisSignal TransductionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31295650
PMCPMC6906085
OpenAlexW2962648458

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.