Evidence mapPaperPMID 31302895Full record

ArticleDrug safety2019

Multimodal Analysis of FDA Drug Safety Communications: Lessons from Zolpidem.

Aaron S Kesselheim, Michael S Sinha, Eric G Campbell, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Paula Rausch, Brian M Lappin, Esther H Zhou, Jerry Avorn, Gerald J Dal Pan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron S KesselheimProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA. akesselheim@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-2666
Michael S SinhaProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Eric G CampbellCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Sebastian SchneeweissProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Paula RauschUS Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Brian M LappinUS Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Esther H ZhouUS Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.
Jerry AvornProgram On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont St., Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Gerald J Dal PanUS Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA. Gerald.DalPan@fda.hhs.gov.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

U.S. Food and Drug Administration HHSF22301001T
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because clinical trials conducted for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval occur in carefully monitored settings and often have strict inclusion criteria for participation, new information about drug safety is commonly discovered once a medication is FDA approved and used by larger numbers of patients. The FDA issues Drug Safety Communications when new information arises about the safety of marketed drugs that may change decision making by healthcare providers and patients. Since their inception, over 250 Drug Safety Communications have been issued alerting consumers and prescribers in the USA about safety risks related to prescription and over-the-counter medications. Researchers at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston in conjunction with officials from the FDA undertook a multi-modal study of the content, dissemination, and uptake of FDA messaging, focusing on two 2013 Drug Safety Communications related to zolpidem (Ambien; Sanofi, Paris, France). Traditional and social media analyses note incomplete dissemination of key DSC messages. Surveys of patients and interviews of physicians and patients suggest important limitations in patient-provider communication that have hindered sharing of safety information with patients. Finally, pharmacoepidemiologic analyses of zolpidem dispensing patterns after the Drug Safety Communications were released suggest possible opportunities for enhancing uptake of new safety knowledge that may lead to changes in clinical practice, where appropriate.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationDrug ApprovalHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Product Surveillance, PostmarketingSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationZolpidemSleep Aids, PharmaceuticalZolpidem

Identifiers

PMID31302895
OpenAlexW2957806958

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.