ArticleClinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes2019
Differences of FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System and Finger Pricks on Clinical Characteristics and Glucose Monitoring Satisfactions in Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Pump.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Endocrinology and diabetes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Pooled it
- Flash glucose monitoring helps achieve better glycemic control than conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2020Trial
- Continuous Insulin Infusion System and self-care in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: scope review.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026Review
- MXenes in diabetes: diagnostic and therapeutic applications.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Medication in Care Home Residents with Type 2 Diabetes (eDMED): A Protocol for a Feasibility Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025Article
- Enhancing Health Equity and Patient Engagement in Diabetes Care: Technology-Aided Continuous Glucose Monitoring Pilot Implementation Project.JMIR diabetes · 2025Article
- Assessing satisfaction, quality of life, and HbA1c changes in type 1 diabetes patients who are using freestyle libre glucose monitoring.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Evidence from clinical trials on high-risk medical devices in children: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Assessment of Patient-reported Satisfaction and Metabolic Outcomes Following Initiation of the Second Generation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reviews · 2024Observational
- Telemonitoring With a Connected Glucose Meter Improves Glycemia Among People With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
- Adherence to glucose monitoring with intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes.Endocrine · 2023Article
- Flash glucose monitoring system in special situations.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Review
- Article
- Sensor-Based Technology: Bringing Value to People with Diabetes and the Healthcare System in an Evolving World.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2022Review
- Practical Considerations for Initiating and Utilizing Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Clinical Practice.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2021Article
- The Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Glycaemic Control and Patient Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes.Cureus · 2021Article
- Fiber Optic Sensors: A Review for Glucose Measurement.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Associated With Blood Glucose Meter Featuring Color Range Indicator in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2021Article
- Digital Health for Supporting Precision Medicine in Pediatric Endocrine Disorders: Opportunities for Improved Patient Care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the different experience of freestyle libre and finger pricks on clinical characteristics and glucose monitoring satisfaction (GMS) in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using insulin pump (IP).
methodsA prospective study was carried out on 47 (aged 17-21 years) T1D, who used conventional finger-pricking method for self-testing the glucose. The experiments were conducted between March 2018 and September 2018. For carrying out the study, the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) sensors were placed on each participant, at the baseline visit, by a trained diabetes educator. Furthermore, to determine the total number of scans conducted during the study period, the respective ambulatory glucose profiles were generated by computing the data collected from the sensors. In addition, a trained interviewer handed over the GMS questionnaire to each patient, at the baseline and at 12 weeks of the study.
resultsIn comparison to the baseline (finger pricks), various parameters such as: HbA1c (
conclusionThe frequency of hypoglycemia, HbA1c level, capillary glucose, daily carbohydrates intake decreased, while the total daily insulin dose, daily bolus insulin and total GMS score increased with the use of FGM scanning for 12 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.