ArticleStem cell research & therapy2019
Osteopetrotic induced pluripotent stem cells derived from patients with different disease-associated mutations by non-integrating reprogramming methods.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-derived cornea organoid model to study metabolomic characterization of rare disease: aniridia-associated keratopathy.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of osteoclast differentiation protocols from human induced pluripotent stem cells of different tissue origins.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Article
- Comparison of osteoclast differentiation protocols from human induced pluripotent stem cells of different tissue origins.Research square · 2023Article
- iPSC-sEVs alleviate microglia senescence to protect against ischemic stroke in aged mice.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Alterations in Hematopoietic and Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Components of the Osteopetrotic Bone Marrow Niche.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- Multiomics landscape of the autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type II disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.Hereditas · 2021Article
- Proteomic Profiling of the First Human Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells from Carbonic Anhydrase II Deficiency Osteopetrosis Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Versatility of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) for Improving the Knowledge on Musculoskeletal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Generation of gene-corrected functional osteoclasts from osteopetrotic induced pluripotent stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Article
- Genotyping, generation and proteomic profiling of the first human autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type II-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.Stem cell research & therapy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutosomal recessive osteopetrosis is a genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous disease, caused by defects in osteoclast formation and function. The only available treatment is allogeneic stem cell transplantation that has still high morbidity and mortality. The goal of the present study was to generate iPSCs from bone marrow-derived MSCs of osteopetrosis patients with three most common mutations by using two different integration-free gene transfer methods and compare their efficiencies. The secondary objective was to select the most appropriate integration-free production method for our institutional iPSC bank using this rare disease as a prototype.
methodsTwo different integration-free gene transfer methods (episomal and Sendai viral vectors) were tested and compared on the same set of patient samples exhibiting three different mutations associated with osteopetrosis. Generated iPSCs were characterized by standard assays, including immunophenotyping, immunocytochemistry, RT-PCR, embryoid body, and teratoma assays. Karyotype analyses were performed to evaluate genetic stability.
resultsiPSC lines exhibiting typical ESC-like colony morphology were shown to express pluripotency markers by immunofluorescence staining. Over 90% of the cells were found positive for SSEA-4 and OCT3/4 and negative/weak positive for CD29 by flow cytometry. Immunohistochemical staining of teratoma and spontaneously differentiated embryoid body sections confirmed their trilineage differentiation potential. All iPSC lines expressed pluripotency-related genes. Karyotype analyses were found normal. Direct sequencing of PCR-amplified DNA showed that disease-related mutations were retained in the patient-specific iPSCs.
conclusionGeneration of iPSC using SeV and episomal DNA vectors have several advantages over other methods like the ease of production, reliability, high efficiency, and safety, which is required for translational research. Furthermore, owing to the pluripotency and self-renewal capacity, patient-specific iPSCs seem to be ideal cell source for the modeling of a rare genetic bone disease like osteopetrosis to identify osteoclast defects, leading to clinical heterogeneity in osteopetrosis patients, especially among those with different mutations in the same gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.