Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31320812›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering and computational biology2019

Extending Classification Algorithms to Case-Control Studies.

Bryan Stanfill, Sarah Reehl, Lisa Bramer, Ernesto S Nakayasu, Stephen S Rich, Thomas O Metz, Marian Rewers, Bobbie-Jo Webb-Robertson, TEDDY Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. RNA sequencing identifiesCytotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bryan StanfillComputing and Analytics Division, National Security Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-5333
Sarah ReehlComputing and Analytics Division, National Security Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Lisa BramerComputing and Analytics Division, National Security Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8384-1926
Ernesto S NakayasuBiological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4056-2695
Stephen S RichCenter for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Thomas O MetzBiological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Marian RewersBarbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.
Bobbie-Jo Webb-RobertsonBiological Sciences Division, Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
TEDDY Study Group

Funding

Data Coordinating Center (DCC)for the Consortium for Identification of EnvironmenUC4DK095300 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2011 to 2011
$56.0M
Data Coordinating CenterU01DK063790 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2002 to 2006
$50.1M
Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001082 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SOKOL, RONALD J. · 2013 to 2017
$48.0M
NIDDK Follow-up on Subjects and Immunological Assessments in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes In The Young Study (TEDDY) (UC4)UC4DK117483 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2017 to 2020
$30.4M
Establish a Data Coordinating Center (DCC) for the Consortium for Identification UC4DK100238 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2014 to 2014
$28.9M
The Study of Epigenetics and Infections in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY)UC4DK112243 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2016 to 2016
$27.0M
Data Coordinating Center (DCC) for the Consortium for Identification of Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) StudyUC4DK106955 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2015 to 2015
$20.0M
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in Young (TEDDY0U01DK063863 · NIDDK · HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND · PI TOPPARI, JORMA · 2003 to 2022
$13.5M
The Environmental Triggers of Diabetes (TEDDY) in SwedenU01DK063861 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LERNMARK, AKE · 2003 to 2022
$13.4M
THE TEDDY STUDY - COLORADO CLINICAL CENTERU01DK063821 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REWERS, MARIAN J · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
The TEDDY Study: Georgia/Florida Clinical CenterU01DK063865 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA (MCG) · PI MCINDOE, RICHARD A. · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001082NIDDK NIH HHS HHSN267200700014CNIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063790NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063821NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063829NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063836NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063861NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063865NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063821NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063829NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063836NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063861NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063865NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK095300NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK100238NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK106955NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK112243NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK117483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classification is a common technique applied to 'omics data to build predictive models and identify potential markers of biomedical outcomes. Despite the prevalence of case-control studies, the number of classification methods available to analyze data generated by such studies is extremely limited. Conditional logistic regression is the most commonly used technique, but the associated modeling assumptions limit its ability to identify a large class of sufficiently complicated 'omic signatures. We propose a data preprocessing step which generalizes and makes any linear or nonlinear classification algorithm, even those typically not appropriate for matched design data, available to be used to model case-control data and identify relevant biomarkers in these study designs. We demonstrate on simulated case-control data that both the classification and variable selection accuracy of each method is improved after applying this processing step and that the proposed methods are comparable to or outperform existing variable selection methods. Finally, we demonstrate the impact of conditional classification algorithms on a large cohort study of children with islet autoimmunity.

Indexed as

biomarker discoveryDiabetesmachine learningsupport vector machinesvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID31320812
PMCPMC6630079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.