ReviewCancers2019
State of the Art of Natural Killer Cell Imaging: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoacoustic Imaging for Women's Gynecological Health: Advances and Clinical Prospects.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Feasibility and optimization ofPhysics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- Present status and future trends in molecular imaging of lymphocytes.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- CAR-NK as a Rapidly Developed and Efficient Immunotherapeutic Strategy against Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Imaging cellular immunotherapies and immune cell biomarkers: from preclinical studies to patients.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Review
- Detection and viability of murine NK cells in vivo in a lymphoma model using fluorine-19 MRI.NMR in biomedicine · 2021Article
- Radiolabeling Strategies of Nanobodies for Imaging Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural killer (NK) cell therapy is a promising alternative to conventional T cell-based treatments, although there is a lack of diagnostic tools to predict and evaluate therapeutic outcomes. Molecular imaging can offer several approaches to non-invasively address this issue. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the state of the art of NK cell imaging and its translational potential. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for published articles on the imaging of NK cells in humans and preclinical models. Study quality was evaluated following Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) criteria. We pooled studies as follows: Optical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine imaging with a total of 21 studies (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.