Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31327133›Full record

ReviewTranslational stroke research2020

Central Noradrenergic Agonists in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke-an Overview.

Zohi Sternberg, B Schaller

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Translational stroke research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implication of Central βArchiv der Pharmazie · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Neuroprotective actions of norepinephrine in neurological diseases.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Delayed Recanalization-How Late Is Not Too Late?Translational stroke research · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zohi SternbergJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo Medical Center, University at Buffalo, 100 High St, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. zs2@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-536X
B SchallerDepartment of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality with a significant health burden worldwide and few treatment options. Among the short- and long-term effects of ischemic stroke is the cardiovascular sympathetic autonomic dysfunction, presented in part as the by-product of the ischemic damage to the noradrenergic centers of the brain. Unlike high levels in the plasma, the brain may face suboptimal levels of norepinephrine (NE), with adverse effects on the clinical and functional outcomes of ischemic stroke. The intravenous administration of NE and other sympathomimetic agents, in an attempt to increase cerebral perfusion pressure, often aggravates the ischemia-induced rise in blood pressure (BP) with life-threatening consequences for stroke patients, the majority of whom present with hypertension at the time of admission. Unlike the systemic administration, the central administration of NE reduces BP while exerting anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. These characteristics of centrally administered NE, combined with the short latency of response, make it an ideal candidate for use in the acute phase of stroke, followed by the use of centrally acting noradrenergic agonists, such as NE reuptake inhibitors and B2-adrenergic receptor agonists for stroke rehabilitation. In addition, a number of nonpharmacological strategies, such as transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS), have the potential to enhance the central noradrenergic functional activities and improve stroke clinical outcomes. Many factors could influence the efficacy of the noradrenergic treatment in stroke patients. These factors include the type of the noradrenergic agent; the dose, frequency, and duration of administration; the timing of administration in relation to the acute event; and the site and characteristics of the ischemic lesions. Having this knowledge, combined with the better understanding of the regulation of noradrenergic receptors in different parts of the brain, would pave the path for the successful use of the centrally acting noradrenergic agents in the management of ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsAnimalsBrain IschemiaDisease Models, AnimalHumansHypertensionIschemic StrokeLocus CoeruleusNeuroprotective AgentsNorepinephrineTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsNeuroprotective AgentsNorepinephrineCerebral blood flowHeart rate variabilityInflammationIschemic conditioningLocus coeruleusNeuroprotectionOxygen-conserving reflex

Identifiers

PMID31327133
OpenAlexW2963664981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.