Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31332514›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

More opioids, more constipation? Evaluation of longitudinal total oral opioid consumption and self-reported constipation in patients with cancer.

Eric J Roeland, Christopher J Sera, Joseph D Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inadequate management of opioid-induced constipation in European cancer pain patients: results of a real-world, multicentre, observational study ("E-StOIC").Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. The P2YBMC gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Rates of appropriate laxative prophylaxis for opioid-induced constipation in veterans with lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric J RoelandMassachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Christopher J SeraMoores Cancer Center, University of California (UC) San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Joseph D MaSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, UC San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0714, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0714, USA. joema@ucsd.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Alliance Cancer Control Program UG1CA189823Cambia Health Foundation Sojourns Scholars Leadership Program XXXXUCSD CTRI KL2 Career Development Award KL2TR001444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a distressing physical symptom for patients with cancer taking opioids. Total opioid consumption may contribute to developing worsening OIC-related symptoms. We completed a retrospective analysis examining the association of total daily opioid consumption on self-reported constipation in patients with cancer.

methodsIn over 5 clinic visits, we collected self-reported constipation scores and 24-h oral morphine equivalents (OME). We examined the association between OME and the presence of constipation (i.e., score > 3) and the relationship of OME between patients with or without constipation.

resultsOf 297 patients with cancer, we observed 57.8% with constipation and 42.4% without constipation at the first clinic visit. Age was similar in both groups (54.2 ± 14.5 vs. 56.4 ± 14.8 years [mean ± SD]) and the majority of patients were women (63.7% vs. 61.1%). The most common cancer type in patients with constipation was non-colorectal gastrointestinal (n = 25, 14.6%), while in patients without constipation was colorectal gastrointestinal (n = 25; 19.8%). Across visits, we observed weak or no association between OME and self-reported constipation (r = 0.01-0.27). At the first visit, higher mean OME was seen in patients who self-reported constipation (133.4 vs 76; p < 0.05). Age, sex, metastatic disease, and stimulant laxative use were not associated with constipation.

conclusionsWe observed weak to no association between OME and constipation in patients with cancer. These results suggest a lack of a clear association between total opioid consumption and self-reported constipation.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCancer PainDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMorphineNeoplasmsOpioid-Induced ConstipationRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineConstipationOpioidOpioid-induced constipationOral morphine equivalentStimulant laxative

Identifiers

PMID31332514
OpenAlexW2963662179

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.