Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31338024›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2019

Local Drug Delivery for Prevention of Hearing Loss.

Leonard P Rybak, Asmita Dhukhwa, Debashree Mukherjea, Vickram Ramkumar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Rational Design of Inner Ear Drug Delivery Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. [Progress of tympanic administration with its application in the treatment of inner ear disease].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonard P RybakDepartment of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, United States.
Asmita DhukhwaDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, United States.
Debashree MukherjeaDepartment of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, United States.
Vickram RamkumarDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Southern Illinois University, Springfield, IL, United States.
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · US

Funding

ENDOGENOUS MODULATION OF OTOTOXICITY OF CISPLATINR01DC002396 · NIDCD · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI RYBAK, LEONARD P · 1994 to 2018
$4.7M
Oral Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) for Treatment of Cisplatin OtotoxicityR01DC016835 · NIDCD · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI RYBAK, LEONARD P · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Transplatin: A Novel Agent to Mitigate Cisplatin ToxicityR01CA166907 · NCI · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI RAMKUMAR, VICKRAM · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
Novel Approaches for Prevention and Treatment of Noise Induced Hearing lossR03DC011621 · NIDCD · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCH OF MED · PI MUKHERJEA, DEBASHREE · 2012 to 2014
$429k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166907NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002396NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016835NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC011621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic delivery of therapeutics for targeting the cochlea to prevent or treat hearing loss is challenging. Systemic drugs have to cross the blood-labyrinth barrier (BLB). BLB can significantly prevent effective penetration of drugs in appropriate concentrations to protect against hearing loss caused by inflammation, ototoxic drugs, or acoustic trauma. This obstacle may be obviated by local administration of protective agents. This route can deliver higher concentration of drug compared to systemic application and preclude systemic side effects. Protective agents have been administered by intra-tympanic injection in numerous preclinical studies. Drugs such as steroids, etanercept, D and L-methionine, pifithrin-alpha, adenosine agonists, melatonin, kenpaullone (a cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) inhibitor) have been reported to show efficacy against cisplatin ototoxicity in animal models. Several siRNAs have been shown to ameliorate cisplatin ototoxicity when administered by intra-tympanic injection. The application of corticosteroids and a number of other drugs with adjuvants appears to enhance efficacy. Administration of siRNAs to knock down AMPK kinase, liver kinase B1 (LKB1) or G9a in the cochlea have been found to ameliorate noise-induced hearing loss. The local administration of these compounds appears to be effective in protecting the cochlea against damage from cisplatin or noise trauma. Furthermore the intra-tympanic route yields maximum protection in the basal turn of the cochlea which is most vulnerable to cisplatin ototoxicity and noise trauma. There appears to be very little transfer of these agents to the systemic circulation. This would avoid potential side effects including interference with anti-tumor efficacy of cisplatin. Nanotechnology offers strategies to effectively deliver protective agents to the cochlea. This review summarizes the pharmacology of local drug delivery by intra-tympanic injection to prevent hearing loss caused by cisplatin and noise exposure in animals. Future refinements in local protective agents provide exciting prospects for amelioration of hearing loss resulting from cisplatin or noise exposure.

Indexed as

acoustic traumacisplatinhearing lossintra-tympanic injectionnoiseototoxicity

Identifiers

PMID31338024
PMCPMC6629775
OpenAlexW2958529757

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.