Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31349718›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Emerging and Novel Treatments for Pituitary Tumors.

Mirela Diana Ilie, Hélène Lasolle, Gérald Raverot

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Transcriptome-Derived Ligand-Receptor Interactome of Major PitNET Subgroups.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Recent Therapeutic Advances in Pituitary Carcinoma.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2023
    Review
  12. Pituitary Tumorigenesis-Implications for Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Aggressive corticotroph tumors and carcinomas.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2022
    Review
  17. [Targeted Drug Therapy for Intracranial Tumors].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2022
    Review
  18. Aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Mirela Diana IlieINSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, 28 Laennec Street, 69008 Lyon, France.
Hélène LasolleINSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, 28 Laennec Street, 69008 Lyon, France.
Gérald RaverotINSERM U1052, CNRS UMR5286, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, 28 Laennec Street, 69008 Lyon, France. gerald.raverot@chu-lyon.fr.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A subset of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) have an aggressive behavior, showing resistance to treatment and/or multiple recurrences in spite of the optimal use of standard therapies (surgery, conventional medical treatments, and radiotherapy). To date, for aggressive PitNETs, temozolomide (TMZ) has been the most used therapeutic option, and has resulted in an improvement in the five-year survival rate in responders. However, given the fact that roughly only one third of patients showed a partial or complete radiological response on the first course of TMZ, and even fewer patients responded to a second course of TMZ, other treatment options are urgently needed. Emerging therapies consist predominantly of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (20 cases), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy (12 cases), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (10 cases), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (six cases), and more recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (one case). Here, we present the available clinical cases published in the literature for each of these treatments. The therapies that currently show the most promise (based on the achievement of partial radiological response in a certain number of cases) are immune checkpoint inhibitors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted therapy. In the future, further improvement of these therapies and the development of other novel therapies, their use in personalized medicine, and a better understanding of combination therapies, will hopefully result in better outcomes for patients bearing aggressive PitNETs.

Indexed as

aggressive pituitary tumorsbevacizumabeverolimusimmunotherapypeptide receptor radionuclide therapypituitary adenomapituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs)temozolomidetreatmenttyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID31349718
PMCPMC6723109
OpenAlexW2964054496

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.