Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31350600›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2019

Blood Pressure and Statin Effects on Cognition: a Review.

Mia Yang, Jeff Williamson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Immunotherapies for Aging-Related Neurodegenerative Diseases-Emerging Perspectives and New Targets.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mia YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. miyang@wakehealth.edu.
Jeff WilliamsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Wake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis is a review of available data on the effects of blood pressure and statins on cognition. RECENT

findingsRecent randomized clinical trials have shown that intensive control of systolic blood pressure in older adults prevented the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and the combined effects of MCI and probable dementia. Previous randomized clinical trials have suggested that statin use may prevent a decline in cognition; however, no randomized clinical trials have clearly shown evidence of statin's either positive or negative effect on cognition. Continued follow-up of SPRINT-MIND participants is crucial to evaluate the long-term effects of intensive systolic blood pressure control on the prevention of cognitive decline. A well-conducted and adequately powered randomized control trial is needed to evaluate the effect of statins on cognition, especially for primary prevention of the cognitive decline in aging.

Indexed as

AgedBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCognitionCognitive DysfunctionDementiaHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypertensionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsBlood pressureCognitionCognitive impairmentDementiaHypertensionStatin

Identifiers

PMID31350600
OpenAlexW2966339723

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.