Evidence mapPaperPMID 31351065Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

Should women with gestational diabetes be screened at delivery hospitalization for type 2 diabetes?

Thaddeus P Waters, Shin Y Kim, Erika Werner, Cheryl Dinglas, Ebony B Carter, Roshni Patel, Andrea J Sharma, Patrick Catalano

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06457139 (Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus With Immediate Postpartum Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06457139 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After Gestational Diabetes Mellitus With Immediate Postpartum Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, WorcesterRan2025 to 2026Enrolled116ConditionsGestational Diabetes, Type 2 DiabetesArmsGlucose tolerance test (2 hour), Active Comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Receipt of postpartum diabetes screening after gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, 2016-2022.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pregnancy as an opportunity to prevent type 2 diabetes mellitus: FIGO Best Practice Advice.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Controversies in Gestational Diabetes.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thaddeus P WatersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL. Electronic address: tedwatersmd@gmail.com.
Shin Y KimDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Erika WernerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Cheryl DinglasNYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY.
Ebony B CarterDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Roshni PatelDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; DB Consulting Group, Atlanta, GA.
Andrea J SharmaDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, Atlanta, GA.
Patrick CatalanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Health, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLess than one-half of women with gestational diabetes mellitus are screened for type 2 diabetes postpartum. Other approaches to postpartum screening need to be evaluated, including the role of screening during the delivery hospitalization.

objectiveTo assess the performance of an oral glucose tolerance test administered during the delivery hospitalization compared with the oral glucose tolerance test administered at a 4- to 12-week postpartum visit. STUDY

designWe conducted a combined analysis of patient-level data from 4 centers (6 clinical sites) assessing the utility of an immediate postpartum 75-g oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization (PP1) for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes compared with a routine 4- to 12-week postpartum oral glucose tolerance test (PP2). Eligible women underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at both PP1 and PP2. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the PP1 test were estimated for diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, or impaired glucose tolerance.

resultsIn total, 319 women completed a PP1 screening, with 152 (47.6%) lost to follow-up for the PP2 oral glucose tolerance test. None of the women with a normal PP1 oral glucose tolerance test (n=73) later tested as having type 2 diabetes at PP2. Overall, 12.6% of subjects (n=21) had a change from normal to impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance or a change from impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes. The PP1 oral glucose tolerance test had 50% sensitivity (11.8-88.2), 95.7% specificity (91.3-98.2%) with a 98.1% (94.5-99.6%) negative predictive value and a 30% (95% confidence interval, 6.7-65.3) positive predictive value for type 2 diabetes vs normal/impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance result. The negative predictive value of having type 2 diabetes at PP2 compared with a normal oral glucose tolerance test (excluding impaired fasting glucose/impaired glucose tolerance) at PP1 was 100% (95% confidence interval, 93.5-100) with a specificity of 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-99.6).

conclusionA normal oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization appears to exclude postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the results of the immediate postpartum oral glucose tolerance test were mixed when including impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance. As a majority of women do not return for postpartum diabetic screening, an oral glucose tolerance test during the delivery hospitalization may be of use in certain circumstances in which postpartum follow-up is challenging and resources could be focused on women with an abnormal screening immediately after the delivery hospitalization.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareDiabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucose IntoleranceGlucose Tolerance TestHospitalizationHumansMass ScreeningPostnatal CarePredictive Value of TestsPregnancySensitivity and Specificitydiabetes mellitusgestational diabetespostpartumpregnancyscreening

Identifiers

PMID31351065
PMCPMC7206508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.