Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31352603›Full record

ReviewDrugs2019

Take-Home Naloxone for the Emergency Interim Management of Opioid Overdose: The Public Health Application of an Emergency Medicine.

John Strang, Rebecca McDonald, Gabrielle Campbell, Louisa Degenhardt, Suzanne Nielsen, Alison Ritter, Ola Dale

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. BMJ open · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A chain of survival for drug overdose.Resuscitation plus · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

John StrangKing's College London, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Addiction Sciences Building, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, UK. john.strang@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-2725
Rebecca McDonaldKing's College London, National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Addiction Sciences Building, 4 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8BB, UK.
Gabrielle CampbellNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0851-0748
Louisa DegenhardtNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8513-2218
Suzanne NielsenNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alison RitterNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ola DaleDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
UNSW Sydney · AUKing's College London · GBNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

Using existing data to understand and ameliorate risk in opioid agonist therapyR01DA044170 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES · PI DEGENHARDT, LOUISA · 2017 to 2019
$641k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naloxone is a well-established essential medicine for the treatment of life-threatening heroin/opioid overdose in emergency medicine. Over two decades, the concept of 'take-home naloxone' has evolved, comprising pre-provision of an emergency supply to laypersons likely to witness an opioid overdose (e.g. peers and family members of people who use opioids as well as non-medical personnel), with the recommendation to administer the naloxone to the overdose victim as interim care while awaiting an ambulance. There is an urgent need for more widespread naloxone access considering the growing problem of opioid overdose deaths, accounting for more than 100,000 deaths worldwide annually. Rises in mortality are particularly sharp in North America, where the ongoing prescription opioid problem is now overlaid with a rapid growth in overdose deaths from heroin and illicit fentanyl. Using opioids alone is dangerous, and the mortality risk is clustered at certain times and contexts, including on prison release and discharge from hospital and residential care. The provision of take-home naloxone has required the introduction of new legislation and new naloxone products. These include pre-filled syringes and auto-injectors and, crucially, new concentrated nasal sprays (four formulations recently approved in different countries) with speed of onset comparable to intramuscular naloxone and relative bioavailability of approximately 40-50%. Choosing the right naloxone dose in the fentanyl era is a matter of ongoing debate, but the safety margin of the approved nasal sprays is superior to improvised nasal kits. New legislation in different countries permits over-the-counter sales or other prescription-free methods of provision. However, access remains uneven with take-home naloxone still not provided in many countries and communities, and with ongoing barriers contributing to implementation inertia. Take-home naloxone is an important component of the response to the global overdose problem, but greater commitment to implementation will be essential, alongside improved affordable products, if a greater impact is to be achieved.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnimalsDrug OverdoseEmergency MedicineHumansNaloxoneOpioid-Related DisordersPublic HealthAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID31352603
PMCPMC6728289
OpenAlexW2966156386

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.