ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Curative effect of β-blocker on various ejection fractions of patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to retrospectively determine the effects of metoprolol on patients presenting with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), but either with or without a reduced ejection fraction (EF). All patients meeting the inclusion criteria were treated for 2 years with metoprolol. Blood pressure, heart rate and echocardiography parameters were measured and analysed in patients before and after treatment. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts as follows: Those presenting with a low EF (<50%) and those with normal EF values (≥50%). In total, 151 patients enrolled were 136; however, of these 15 were lost to mortality during the follow-up period, thus leaving a total of 136 patients. In total, 42 patients presented EF values <50%, while the remaining 94 presented with normal EF values. Treatment with metoprolol controlled blood pressure (both diastolic and systolic) and heart rate in patients with both low and normal EF values. EF values in the low EF group significantly increased following treatment. In addition, the echocardiography data revealed a statistically significant decrease in left atrial and ventricular diameters in the low EF group. On the whole, the findings of this study demonstrate that patients with AF and low EF values who were treated with metoprolol presented with improved cardiac function parameters. However, metoprolol should be contraindicated for patients with high EF values (i.e., absence of heart failure) as it seemed to increase their risk of heart failure based on the N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.