Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31369916›Full record

ArticleBone2019

Transcriptional profiling of intramembranous and endochondral ossification after fracture in mice.

Brandon A Coates, Jennifer A McKenzie, Evan G Buettmann, Xiaochen Liu, Paul M Gontarz, Bo Zhang, Matthew J Silva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Advancing Nanomedicine: For Bone Defect Repair and Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon A CoatesDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America. Electronic address: bcoates@wustl.edu.
Jennifer A McKenzieDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Evan G BuettmannDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Xiaochen LiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Paul M GontarzDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Matthew J SilvaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Center for Cellular ImagingP30CA091842 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY J. EBERLEIN · 2001 to 2026
$128.0M
WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Resource Based Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and Medicine (Overall Application)P30AR074992 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW J SILVA · 2019 to 2026
$6.8M
The Role of the Osteoblast Secretome in Bone FormationP30AR057235 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SWARNKAR, GAURAV · 2009 to 2018
$5.7M
OSTEOGENIC AND ANGIOGENIC RESPONSE TO SKELETAL LOADINGR01AR050211 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SILVA, MATTHEW J · 2003 to 2020
$5.0M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY FROM NM TO CMT32EB018266 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BAYLY, PHILIP V · 2014 to 2018
$987k
WHOLE SLIDE IMAGING SYSTEM FOR TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCES10RR027552 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, JIN-MOO · 2010 to 2010
$275k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCI NIH HHS P30 CA091842NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027552NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR057235NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR074992NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR050211NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB018266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone fracture repair represents an important clinical challenge with nearly 1 million non-union fractures occurring annually in the U.S. Gene expression differs between non-union and healthy repair, suggesting there is a pattern of gene expression that is indicative of optimal repair. Despite this, the gene expression profile of fracture repair remains incompletely understood. In this work, we used RNA-seq of two well-established murine fracture models to describe gene expression of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. We used top differentially expressed genes, enriched gene ontology terms and pathways, callus cellular phenotyping, and histology to describe and contrast these bone formation processes across time. Intramembranous repair, as modeled by ulnar stress fracture, and endochondral repair, as modeled by femur full fracture, exhibited vastly different transcriptional profiles throughout repair. Stress fracture healing had enriched differentially expressed genes associated with bone repair and osteoblasts, highlighting the strong osteogenic repair process of this model. Interestingly, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was one of only a few pathways uniquely enriched in stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair involved a higher level of inflammatory and immune cell related genes than did stress fracture repair. Full fracture repair also differed from stress fracture in a robust downregulation of ion channel genes following injury, the role of which in fracture repair is unclear. This study offers a broad description of gene expression in intramembranous and endochondral ossification across several time points throughout repair and suggests several potentially intriguing genes, pathways, and cells whose role in fracture repair requires further study.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBony CallusDisease ProgressionFemaleFracture HealingFractures, BoneFractures, StressGene Expression RegulationGene OntologyMembranesMice, Inbred C57BLOsteogenesisPhenotypePrincipal Component AnalysisAnimal modelsBoneFracture repairTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31369916
PMCPMC6708791
OpenAlexW2965890438

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.