Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31370251›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2019

Optical Tweezers: Phototoxicity and Thermal Stress in Cells and Biomolecules.

Alfonso Blázquez-Castro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trigger factor accelerates nascent chain compaction and folding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acoustography by Beam Engineering and Acoustic Control Node: BEACON.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Thermo-optical tweezers based on photothermal waveguides.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Raman cell sorting for single-cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alfonso Blázquez-CastroDepartment of Physics of Materials, Faculty of Sciences, Autonomous University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain. alfonso.blazquez@uam.es.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-7065

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions EU project 713366 - InterTalentum
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For several decades optical tweezers have proven to be an invaluable tool in the study and analysis of myriad biological responses and applications. However, as with every tool, they can have undesirable or damaging effects upon the very sample they are helping to study. In this review the main negative effects of optical tweezers upon biostructures and living systems will be presented. There are three main areas on which the review will focus: linear optical excitation within the tweezers, non-linear photonic effects, and thermal load upon the sampled volume. Additional information is provided on negative mechanical effects of optical traps on biological structures. Strategies to avoid or, at least, minimize these negative effects will be introduced. Finally, all these effects, undesirable for the most, can have positive applications under the right conditions. Some hints in this direction will also be discussed.

Indexed as

optical trapoptical tweezersoxidative stressphotodamagephotothermalphototoxicityreactive oxygen species (ROS)singlet oxygen

Identifiers

PMID31370251
PMCPMC6722566

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.