Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31371509›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Protein stability engineering insights revealed by domain-wide comprehensive mutagenesis.

Alex Nisthal, Connie Y Wang, Marie L Ary, Stephen L Mayo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Distinguishing direct interactions from global epistasis using rank statistics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Dissecting the effects of single amino acid substitutions in SARS-CoV-2 Mpro.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Predicting absolute protein folding stability using generative models.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Insight into Protein Engineering: FromCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex NisthalDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; nisthal@caltech.edu steve@mayo.caltech.edu.
Connie Y WangProtabit, LLC, Pasadena, CA 91106.
Marie L AryProtabit, LLC, Pasadena, CA 91106.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-1746
Stephen L MayoDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; nisthal@caltech.edu steve@mayo.caltech.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate prediction of protein stability upon sequence mutation is an important but unsolved challenge in protein engineering. Large mutational datasets are required to train computational predictors, but traditional methods for collecting stability data are either low-throughput or measure protein stability indirectly. Here, we develop an automated method to generate thermodynamic stability data for nearly every single mutant in a small 56-residue protein. Analysis reveals that most single mutants have a neutral effect on stability, mutational sensitivity is largely governed by residue burial, and unexpectedly, hydrophobics are the best tolerated amino acid type. Correlating the output of various stability-prediction algorithms against our data shows that nearly all perform better on boundary and surface positions than for those in the core and are better at predicting large-to-small mutations than small-to-large ones. We show that the most stable variants in the single-mutant landscape are better identified using combinations of 2 prediction algorithms and including more algorithms can provide diminishing returns. In most cases, poor in silico predictions were tied to compositional differences between the data being analyzed and the datasets used to train the algorithm. Finally, we find that strategies to extract stabilities from high-throughput fitness data such as deep mutational scanning are promising and that data produced by these methods may be applicable toward training future stability-prediction tools.

Indexed as

Protein EngineeringProtein StabilityAmino AcidsAmino Acid SubstitutionComputer SimulationMutagenesisMutationProtein DomainsProteinsThermodynamicsAmino AcidsProteinsmutagenesisprotein engineeringprotein Gprotein stability predictionthermodynamic stability

Identifiers

PMID31371509
PMCPMC6697890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.