ReviewDer Internist2019
[New technologies in diabetes treatment].
Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technological progress has led to numerous innovations in diagnostic and therapeutic applications in diabetes and will also improve the treatment of patients with diabetes in the future. The first commercially available hybrid closed-loop system has been available in the USA since 2016 and the next developmental step toward a fully automated artificial pancreas has been made. The automated control of the basal insulin secretion provides a stabilization of blood glucose with a reduction of hypoglycemia and improvement of long-term control as indicated by improved hemoglobin A1c levels. Although closed-loop systems are not yet officially available in Germany, patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus already benefit from a new generation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems. Apart from the increased accuracy these new devices can be used for up to 180 days and do not require daily calibration. This article provides a short overview of the innovations in CGM systems and the current status in the development of the artificial pancreas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.