Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31384310›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2019

Assessment of dapagliflozin effect on diabetic endothelial dysfunction of brachial artery (ADDENDA-BHS2 trial): rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial.

Riobaldo M R Cintra, Alexandre A S Soares, Ikaro Breder, Daniel B Munhoz, Joaquim Barreto, Sheila T Kimura-Medorima, Pamela Cavalcante, Renata Zanchetta, Jessica Cunha Breder, Camila Moreira and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Riobaldo M R Cintra1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Alexandre A S Soares1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Ikaro Breder1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Daniel B Munhoz1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Joaquim Barreto1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Sheila T Kimura-Medorima1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Pamela Cavalcante1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Renata Zanchetta1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Jessica Cunha Breder1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Camila Moreira1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Vitor W Virginio1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Isabella Bonilha1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Jose Carlos Lima-Junior1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Otavio R Coelho-Filho1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Vaneza L W Wolf1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Gil Guerra-Junior2Growth and Body Composition Lab, Center for Investigation in Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo Brazil.
Daniela C Oliveira1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Rodrigo Haeitmann1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Vicente H R Fernandes2Growth and Body Composition Lab, Center for Investigation in Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo Brazil.
Wilson Nadruz1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Fernando R P Chaves3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo Brazil.
Carlos E L Arieta3Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo Brazil.
Thiago Quinaglia1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.
Andrei C Sposito1Cardiology Division, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13084-971 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7127-2052
ADDENDA-BHS2 trial investigators
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndothelial dysfunction (ED) is a hallmark in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that favor both atherogenesis and ischemia and reperfusion injury (IRI). Sodium-glucose-2 co-transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) may hypothetically improve microvascular and macrovascular functions via a broad spectrum of mechanisms, being superior to traditional antidiabetic therapy such as sulfonylurea, even in subjects under equivalent glycemic control. Hence, the present clinical trial was designed to compare the effect of these two treatments on markers of arterial wall function and inflammation in T2DM patients as well as on the potential mediating parameters. METHOD AND

resultsADDENDA-BHS2 is a prospective, single-center, active-controlled, open, randomized trial. Ninety-eight participants (40-70 years old) with HbA1c 7-9% were randomized (1:1, stratified by gender, BMI and HbA1c levels) to either dapagliflozin 10 mg/day or glibenclamide 5 mg/day on top of metformin. The primary endpoint was the change of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after a 12-week period of treatment evaluated at rest and after IRI between dapagliflozin and glibenclamide arms. Secondary outcomes were defined as the difference between treatments regarding: plasma nitric oxide (NO) change after FMD, plasma isoprostane, plasma levels of vascular inflammatory markers and systemic inflammatory markers, plasma levels of adipokines, anthropometric measures, glucose control parameters, office and ambulatory BP control. Safety endpoints were defined as systolic and diastolic function assessed by echocardiography and retinopathy change. Serious adverse events were recorded. The study protocol was approved by the Independent Scientific Advisory Committee.

conclusionThe ADDENDA-BHS2 trial is an investigator-initiated clinical trial comparing the effect of dapagliflozin versus glibenclamide on several aspects of vascular function in high cardiovascular risk T2DM patients. Besides, a large clinical and biochemical phenotype assessment will be obtained for exploring potential mediations and associations.

Indexed as

DapagliflozinDiabetesEndothelial functionGlibenclamideSGLT2i

Identifiers

PMID31384310
PMCPMC6668143
OpenAlexW2965303433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.