ArticleBiophysical journal2019
The Effect of Phosphatidylserine on a pH-Responsive Peptide Is Defined by Its Noninserting End.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Innate Immunity to Cancer Therapy: Antimicrobial Peptides as Emerging Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Tumor-targeted liposomes with platycodin D2 promote apoptosis in colorectal cancer.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- TheeLife · 2022Article
- Spiers Memorial Lecture: Analysis andFaraday discussions · 2021Article
- Expanding MPEx Hydropathy Analysis to Account for Electrostatic Contributions to Protein Interactions with Anionic Membranes.The Journal of membrane biology · 2021Article
- Improved growth ofJournal of bacteriology · 2021Article
- pH-responsive high stability polymeric nanoparticles for targeted delivery of anticancer therapeutics.Communications biology · 2020Article
- PIPThe Journal of biological chemistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The acidity-triggered rational membrane (ATRAM) peptide was designed to target acidic diseases such as cancer. An acidic extracellular medium, such as that found in aggressive tumors, drives the protonation of the glutamic acids in ATRAM, leading to the membrane translocation of its C-terminus and the formation of a transmembrane helix. Compared to healthy cells, cancerous cells often increase exposure of the negatively charged phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane. Here we use a reconstituted vesicle system to explore how PS influences the interaction of ATRAM with membranes. To explore this, we used two new variants of ATRAM, termed K2-ATRAM and Y-ATRAM, with small modifications at the noninserting N-terminus. We observed that the effect of PS on the membrane insertion pK and lipid partitioning hinged on the sequence of the noninserting end. Our data additionally indicate that the effect of PS on the insertion pK does not merely depend on electrostatics, but it is multifactorial. Here we show how small sequence changes can impact the interaction of a peptide with membranes of mixed lipid composition. These data illustrate how model studies using neutral bilayers, which do not mimic the negative charge found in the plasma membrane of cancer cells, may fail to capture important aspects of the interaction of anticancer peptides with tumor cells. This information can guide the design of therapeutic peptides that target the acidic environments of different diseased tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.