Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31407368›Full record

SynthesisClinical cardiology2019

The prevalence of 30-day readmission after acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huijie Wang, Ting Zhao, Xiaoliang Wei, Huifang Lu, Xiufang Lin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05015634 (Remote Acute Assessment of Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05015634 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Remote Acute Assessment of Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk Post-Acute Coronary Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2022 to 2025Enrolled337ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Acute Coronary SyndromeArmsActive Arm, Control Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huijie WangDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention, Interventional Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-7044
Ting ZhaoDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention, Interventional Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Xiaoliang WeiDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention, Interventional Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Huifang LuDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention, Interventional Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Xiufang LinDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Intervention, Interventional Medical Center, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe 30-day readmission is associated with increased medical costs, which has become an important quality metric in several medical institutions. This current study is aimed at clarifying the prevalence, the underlying risk factors, and reasons of the 30-day readmission after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify eligible studies. Random-effect models were employed to perform pooled analyses. Means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate prevalence and reasons for 30-day readmission. We also used Odds ratios (ORs) to explore the potential significant predictors of risk factors of 30-day readmission after AMI. Potential publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and Begg'test.

resultsA total of 14 relevant studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled 30-day readmission rate of AMI was 12% (95% CI 0.11-0.14). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), angina and acute ischemic heart disease, and heart failure (HF) were the principal cardiovascular reasons of 30-day readmission. Meanwhile, non-specific chest pain was regarded as the significant cause among non-cardiovascular reasons. The common co-morbidities kidney disease, HF and diabetes mellitus were significant risk factors for 30-day readmission. No significant publication bias was found by funnel plot and statistical tests.

conclusionsThe 30-day readmission rate of post-AMI ranged from 11% to 14% and can be mainly attributed to cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular events. The common co-morbidities, such as kidney disease, HF, and diabetes mellitus were significant risk factors for 30-day readmission.

Indexed as

Global HealthHumansMyocardial InfarctionPatient ReadmissionPrevalenceRisk FactorsTime Factorsacute myocardial infarction (AMI)meta-analysisprevalencereadmission

Identifiers

PMID31407368
PMCPMC6788479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.