Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31411932›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2019

Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.

Gerard Derosiere, David Thura, Paul Cisek, Julie Duque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gerard DerosiereLaboratory of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8283-1569
David ThuraLyon Neuroscience Research Center - IMPACT Team, INSERM U1028 - CNRS UMR 5292, Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-7180
Paul CisekDepartment of Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Julie DuqueLaboratory of Neurophysiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisions about actions typically involve a period of deliberation that ends with the commitment to a choice and the motor processes overtly expressing that choice. Previous studies have shown that neural activity in sensorimotor areas, including the primary motor cortex (M1), correlates with deliberation features during action selection. However, the causal contribution of these areas to the decision process remains unclear. Here, we investigated whether M1 determines choice commitment or whether it simply reflects decision signals coming from upstream structures and instead mainly contributes to the motor processes that follow commitment. To do so, we tested the impact of a disruption of M1 activity, induced by continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), on the behavior of human subjects in

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexReaction TimeRewardTheta Rhythmaction selectionmotor cortexmovement preparationTMSurgency

Identifiers

PMID31411932
PMCPMC6843092

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.