ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2019
The clinical significance of statins-macrolides interaction: comprehensive review of in vivo studies, case reports, and population studies.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A rare rosuvastatin-clarithromycin interaction presenting with acute liver injury and delayed rhabdomyolysis.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Tackling Neutrophilic Inflammation in Bronchiectasis: From Macrolides to Cathepsin C Inhibitors.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- A Rare Case of Erythromycin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis.Cureus · 2024Article
- Past, present, and future biomarkers of kidney function and injury: The relationship with antibiotics.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2024Review
- Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024Observational
- Drug-Drug Interactions in Nosocomial Infections: An Updated Review for Clinicians.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Supporting Patients with Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Disease: Ensuring Best Practice in UK Healthcare Settings.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Statin use in total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Antibiotics and Lipid-Modifying Agents: Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Their Clinical Implications.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Safety and Tolerability of Antimicrobial Agents in the Older Patient.Drugs & aging · 2023Review
- Detection of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis and muscular related adverse events through data mining technique.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Article
- Influence of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition on Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B3-Mediated Uptake.Molecular pharmacology · 2022Article
- Molecular targets of statins and their potential side effects: Not all the glitter is gold.European journal of pharmacology · 2022Review
- Colchicine Use and Risks of Stroke Recurrence in Acute Non-Cardiogenic Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Managing hyperlipidaemia in patients with COVID-19 and during its pandemic: An expert panel position statement from HEART UK.Atherosclerosis · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this article were to review the mechanism and clinical significance of statins-macrolides interaction, determine which combination has the highest risk for the interaction, and identify key patients' risk factors for the interaction in relation to the development of muscle toxicity. A literature review was conducted in PubMed and Embase (1946 to December 2018) using combined terms: statins - as group and individual agents, macrolides - as group and individual agents, drug interaction, muscle toxicity, rhabdomyolysis, CYP3A4 inhibitors, and OAT1B inhibitors, with forward and backward citation tracking. Relevant English language in vivo studies in healthy volunteers, case reports, and population studies were included. The interaction between statins and macrolides depends on the type of statin and macrolide used. The mechanism of the interaction is due to macrolides' inhibition of CYP3A4 isoenzyme and OAT1B transporter causing increased exposure to statins. The correlation of this increased statin's exposure to the development of muscle toxicity could not be established, unless the patient had other risk factors such as advanced age, cardiovascular diseases, renal impairment, diabetes, and the concomitant use of other CYP3A4 inhibitors. Simvastatin, lovastatin, and to lesser extent atorvastatin are the statins most affected by this interaction. Rosuvastatin, fluvastatin, and pravastatin are not significantly affected by this interaction. Telithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin are the most "offending" macrolides, while azithromycin appears to be safe to use with statins. This review presented a clear description of the clinical significance of this interaction in real practice. Also, it provided health care professionals with clear suggestions and recommendations on how to overcome this interaction. In conclusion, understanding the different characteristics of each statin and macrolide, as well as key patients' risk factors, will enable health care providers to utilize both groups effectively without compromising patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.