Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31416116›Full record

ArticleCells2019

Paraimmunobiotic Bifidobacteria Modulate the Expression Patterns of Peptidoglycan Recognition Proteins in Porcine Intestinal Epitheliocytes and Antigen Presenting Cells.

Hikaru Iida, Masanori Tohno, Md Aminul Islam, Nana Sato, Hisakazu Kobayashi, Leonardo Albarracin, Akm Humayun Kober, Wakako Ikeda-Ohtsubo, Yoshihito Suda, Hisashi Aso and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. mSystems · 2024
    Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hikaru IidaFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Masanori TohnoCentral Region Agricultural Research Centre, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Nasushiobara 29-2793, Japan.
Md Aminul IslamFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1979-9652
Nana SatoFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Hisakazu KobayashiFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Leonardo AlbarracinFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Akm Humayun KoberFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Wakako Ikeda-OhtsuboFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Yoshihito SudaDepartment of Food, Agriculture and Environment, Miyagi University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Hisashi AsoLivestock Immunology Unit, International Education and Research Center for Food Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Tomonori NochiCell Biology Laboratory, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan.
Ayako MiyazakiViral Diseases and Epidemiology Research Division, National Institute of Animal Health, NARO, Tsukuba 305-0853, Japan.
Hirohide UenishiAnimal Bioregulation Unit, Division of Animal Sciences, Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8634, Japan.
Noriyuki IwabuchiFood Science and Technology Institute, Morinaga Milk Industry Co. Ltd., Zama, Kanagawa 252-8583, Japan.
Jin-Zhong XiaoNext Generation Science Institute, Morinaga Milk Industry Co. Ltd., Zama, Kanagawa 252-8583, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-9086
Julio VillenaFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan. jcvillena@cerela.org.ar.
Haruki KitazawaFood and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Products Chemistry, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan. haruki.kitazawa.c7@tohoku.ac.jp.
Tohoku University · JPConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPMegmilk Snow Brand (Japan) · JPMiyagi University · JPMorinaga (Japan) · JPNational Institute of Animal Health · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGLYRPs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are able to induce innate immune responses through their binding to peptidoglycan (PGN), lipopolysaccharide, or lipoteichoic acid, or by interacting with other PRR-ligands. Recently, progress has been made in understanding the immunobiology of PGLYRPs in human and mice, however, their functions in livestock animals have been less explored. In this study, we characterized the expression patterns of PGLYRPs in porcine intestinal epithelial (PIE) cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and their modulation by the interactions of host cells with PRR-ligands and non-viable immunomodulatory probiotics referred to as paraimmunobiotics. We demonstrated that PGLYRP-1, -2, -3, and -4 are expressed in PIE cells and APCs from Peyer's patches, being PGLYPR-3 and -4 levels higher than PGLYRP-1 and -2. We also showed that PGLYRPs expression in APCs and PIE cells can be modulated by different PRR agonists. By using knockdown PIE cells for TLR2, TLR4, NOD1, and NOD2, or the four PGLYRPs, we demonstrated that PGLYRPs expressions would be required for activation and functioning of TLR2, TLR4, NOD1, and NOD2 in porcine epitheliocytes, but PGLYRPs activation would be independent of those PRR expressions. Importantly, we reported for the first time that PGLYRPs expression can be differentially modulated by paraimmunobiotic bifidobacteria in a strain-dependent manner. These results provide evidence for the use of paraimmunobiotic bifidobacteria as an alternative for the improvement of resistance to intestinal infections or as therapeutic tools for the reduction of the severity of inflammatory damage in diseases in which a role of PGLYRPs-microbe interaction has been demonstrated.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsBifidobacteriumCarrier ProteinsIntestinal MucosaPeyer's PatchesReceptors, Pattern RecognitionSpleenSwineCarrier Proteinspeptidoglycan recognition proteinReceptors, Pattern Recognitionbifidobacteriainnate immunityparaimmunobioticspeptidoglycan recognition proteinporcine antigen-presenting cellsporcine intestinal epitheliocytes

Identifiers

PMID31416116
PMCPMC6721749
OpenAlexW2968255939

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.