Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31417580›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2019

Phellem Cell-Wall Components Are Discriminants of Cork Quality in

Carla Pinheiro, Stefanie Wienkoop, João Feio de Almeida, Cecilia Brunetti, Olfa Zarrouk, Sébastien Planchon, Antonella Gori, Massimiliano Tattini, Cândido Pinto Ricardo, Jenny Renaut and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cork Development: What Lies Within.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Multiomics Molecular Research into the Recalcitrant and OrphanInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Carla PinheiroFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Stefanie WienkoopDepartment of Ecogenomics and Systems Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
João Feio de AlmeidaUCIBIO - REQUIMTE, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Caparica, Portugal.
Cecilia BrunettiNational Research Council of Italy, Trees and Timber Institute, Florence, Italy.
Olfa ZarroukInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sébastien PlanchonLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Antonella GoriDepartment of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Massimiliano TattiniInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection, National Research Council of Italy, Florence, Italy.
Cândido Pinto RicardoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Jenny RenautLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Rita Teresa TeixeiraInstituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUInstitute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITNational Research Council · ITRede de Química e Tecnologia · PTUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cork is a renewable, non-wood high valued forest product, with relevant ecological and economic impact in the Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Currently, cork is ranked according to its commercial quality. The most valuable planks are chosen for cork stoppers production. Cork planks with adequate thickness and porosity are classified as stoppable quality cork (SQC). The chemical composition of cork is known, but the regulation of metabolic pathways responsible of cork production and composition, hence of cork quality, is largely unknown. Here, we tested the hypothesis that post-genomic events may be responsible for the development of SQC and N-SQC (non-stoppable quality cork). Here, we show that combined proteomics and targeted metabolomics (namely soluble and cell wall bound phenolics) analyzed on recently formed phellem allows discriminate cork planks of different quality. Phellem cells of SQC and N-SQC displayed different reducing capacity, with consequential impact on both enzymatic pathways (e.g., glycolysis) and other cellular functions, including cell wall assembly and suberization. Glycolysis and respiration related proteins were abundant in both cork quality groups, whereas the level of several proteins associated to mitochondrial metabolism was higher in N-SQC. The soluble and cell wall-bound phenolics in recently formed phellem clearly discriminated SQC from N-SCQ. In our study, SQC was characterized by a high incorporation of aromatic components of the phenylpropanoid pathway in the cell wall, together with a lower content of hydrolysable tannins. Here, we propose that the level of hydrolysable tannins may represent a valuable diagnostic tool for screening recently formed phellem, and used as a proxy for the quality grade of cork plank produced by each tree.

Indexed as

cell-wall immobilized phenolicshydrolysable tanninsproteomicssoluble phenolicstargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID31417580
PMCPMC6682605
OpenAlexW2956163786

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.