Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31428900›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2019

Current practice in the management of branch retinal vein occlusion in Japan: Survey results of retina specialists in Japan.

Yuichiro Ogura, Mineo Kondo, Kazuaki Kadonosono, Masahiko Shimura, Motohiro Kamei, Akitaka Tsujikawa

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yuichiro OguraDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, 467-8601, Japan. ogura@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.
Mineo KondoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Kazuaki KadonosonoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Micro-technology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Masahiko ShimuraTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Hachioji, Japan.
Motohiro KameiAichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan.
Akitaka TsujikawaKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Aichi Medical University Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPMie University · JPMizuho (Japan) · JPTokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo elucidate the current clinical practice patterns of branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) management by retina specialists in Japan in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. STUDY

designA voting survey using an answer pad system.

methodsOn May 28, 2017, forty-one retina specialists were surveyed on the pathology and clinical practice of BRVO management.

resultsMost specialists (77.5%) use fundus examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for diagnosis of macular edema (ME) secondary to BRVO. All assess the condition of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) and consider this a visual prognostic factor. For ME secondary to BRVO, anti-VEGF therapy is the first choice, and most specialists (82.4%) select initial injection followed by a pro re nata (PRN) regimen. For switching to other treatment options for persistent cases, combination therapy of anti-VEGF injections and laser therapy is the most common choice (35.9%), whereas 25.6% select vitreous surgery and 15.4% select adding steroid injections.

conclusionsOur survey presents the current opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of BRVO by retina specialists in Japan, and reveals the common views about damage to the EZ/ELM as a factor of poor prognosis and anti-VEGF therapy as the first line treatment, highlighting various opinions on initiation and switching of therapy.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesAngiogenesis InhibitorsClinical CompetenceHumansJapanLaser TherapyOphthalmologistsRetinal Vein OcclusionRetrospective StudiesSpecializationTomography, Optical CoherenceVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAnti-VEGFBranch retinal vein occlusionMacular edemaReal practiceRetina specialist

Identifiers

PMID31428900
OpenAlexW2969828890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.