SynthesisHeart failure reviews2020
Comparison of clinical profiles between takotsubo syndrome and acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Heart failure reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between neutrophil percentage to albumin ratio and mortality in takotsubo syndrome patients: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features for differentiation between acute myocardial infarction with and without obstructive coronary arteries.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Hyponatremia in takotsubo syndrome is associated with attenuated in-hospital improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction and higher long-term mortality.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- The Octopus Trap of Takotsubo and Stroke: Genetics, Biomarkers and Clinical Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- TakoTsubo Syndrome: A Well-Known Disease but Not Everything Is Clear Yet.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Spectrum of radionuclide perfusion study abnormalities in takotsubo cardiomyopathy.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Psychological Characteristics of Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome and Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Explorative Study toward a Better Personalized Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to analyse the differences in clinical profiles between takotsubo syndrome (TTS) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and to consolidate the evidence regarding the mortality predictors in TTS patients. Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register was made, and 55 studies with a total of 66,653 TTS patients were included. Compared with ACS subjects, TTS subjects had significantly lower left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) values on admission; however, cardiovascular risks were fewer and the recovery LVEF was notably higher at both discharge and follow-up in TTS patients than in ACS patients (all P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed either in-hospital mortality or long-term mortality between the two groups (both P > 0.05). Acute renal failure and malignancies were independent predictors of all-cause in-hospital mortality in TTS patients (both P < 0.05). Male sex (HR = 0.565, 95% CI 0.253-0.876, P < 0.001, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
31446536What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.