Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450754›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior under Free-Living Conditions: Comparison of Active Style Pro HJA-350IT and ActiGraph

Shohei Yano, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Suzanne Mavoa, Koichiro Oka

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of Physical Activity and Related Factors among Adults with Visual Impairments in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shohei YanoInstitute for Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama 359-1192, Japan. shoheiyano2018@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4819-4380
Mohammad Javad KoohsariFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9384-5456
Ai ShibataFaculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8574, Japan.
Kaori IshiiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8077-4895
Suzanne MavoaMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-2988
Koichiro OkaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various accelerometers have been used in research measuring physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB). This study compared two triaxial accelerometers-Active style Pro (ASP) and ActiGraph (AG)-in measuring PA and SB during work and nonwork days in free-living conditions. A total of 50 working participants simultaneously wore these two accelerometers on one work day and one nonwork day. The difference and agreement between the ASP and AG were analyzed using paired

Indexed as

ExerciseSedentary BehaviorActigraphyAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Resultsaccelerometersaccelerometryactivity monitorsobjective assessmentsitting time

Identifiers

PMID31450754
PMCPMC6747387

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.