Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31453372›Full record

ReviewNPJ digital medicine2019

The "inconvenient truth" about AI in healthcare.

Trishan Panch, Heather Mattie, Leo Anthony Celi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring an AI-First Healthcare System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trishan Panch1Division of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA.
Heather MattieWellframe Inc., Boston, MA USA.
Leo Anthony Celi4Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6712-6626

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
ROLE OF TFII-I IN CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENTR01DE017205 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BAYARSAIHAN, DASHZEVEG · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
CRCNS - Higher-Level Neural Specialization/Natural ShapeR01EY017205 · NEI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CONNOR, CHARLES E · 2005 to 2008
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017205NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health policyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID31453372
PMCPMC6697674

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.